The odds were 10-1 for Louis. Imo, Godoy closed them to be about even. This content is protected 1. It was rough from the start. Godoy. 2. Godoy. 3. Louis was on the defensive and a lot of in-close punching was done. I was surprised by the amount of solid punches Godoy hit Louis with. Godoy. 4. Another rock-em, sock-em round as Godoy continuously kept Louis on the backfoot. Godoy. 5. Godoy appeared tired after all that he had done in the first four. However, Louis did not capitalize. Louis. 6. Clinch-fest. Even. 7. Godoy ducked, I'm quite sure, illegally low over and over again. Godoy. 8. An inside war was taking place in the neutral corner, Louis on the ropes. Godoy. 9. More thrilling exchanges. Even. 10, 12. Very slow rounds. Who could blame them? Both even. 13. Louis finally fought in a more traditional stance of attack, sticking the jab to Godoy. Louis. 14. Slow. Louis took it on activity. Louis. 15. Even. Final score: 6-3-4 for Godoy. That's right. I thought it was a robbery. Godoy was an unrelenting opponent and Louis could not get started. I think he was off-set by Godoy's very basic but effective power, aggressiveness, and stamina. I think it was all the time spent on the defensive that confused Louis. Godoy was the aggressor for 13 of the 15 rounds. I think Godoy was blatantly robbed, but he showed good sport to Louis, as did Louis to Godoy, after the fight. I agree with both men's comments: "); margin: 0px 0px 1rem; padding: 0px 0px 0px 3.5ex; color: rgb(33, 37, 41); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"> Joe Louis: "This was the worst fight I ever had." Arturo Godoy: "Of course, I think I win. Certainly, I should get no worse than draw." Verdict: As I have covered above, a poor Louis performance. That is undoubted. It was a good fight though. The first 9 rounds were some of the most terrific rounds of infighting I've seen of late, at least for action. Tbh though, aside from action, I wouldn't watch this fight. If you're a Louis fan, it will break you're heart.
I like your strong opinion on the decision. While I may not agree it certainly was a close contest with the constant in fighting. Louis had to go back to the shop and set matters right in the rematch.
Joe Louis is overated. He gets to many passes for his duration as champ, but got quite a few gifts decision. . One of his greatest assets as a champion was his adaptability. He always did better in the rematches. But, Yeah - He lost this one.
I used to think Louis was overrated, but I've been watching him often these last several weeks and he's definitely not. If anything his technical skills are underrated. This was a gift decision, but the only one Louis ever received in his prime. Actually, only two men lasted the distance with him from 1938 to 1942-Farr and Godoy, and Farr certainly did not beat Louis. Louis did clearly lose to Walcott in 1947 only to win the decision, but that is the only other. It's not favoritist, it's facts.
Yeah, but Armstrong/Ambers wasn’t close or even that good a fight. You melt my brain sometimes, William.
But, your opinions are as fresh as dandelions and you really devote yourself to your passion for boxing. You’re probably my favorite poster.
I think that Godoy confused Louis throughout the fight with his ridiculousy low crouch and constant pressure, but it's not like he scored much either. I think it was interesting fight and Arturo certainly gave Louis a tough time, but I don't think it's a robbery because he didn't do enough to win it cleanly. Arturo was very interesting fighter to watch though, he's underappreciated nowadays. His chin was from iron and he was very tricky.
I don't think that any decision that he received as champion, could be regarded as a gift. You can't really make that statement based on highlights of the fight.
6-3-4 is not a robbery. If you scored three rounds for Louis, and four even, then by definition it could reasonably have been scored for Louis.
A 15-round fight takes more than 25 minutes to project, so that means these rounds are incomplete highlights, which means none of us can have a true and accurate opinion of the result because unlike the judges/referee/reporters/fans, we did not and cannot see the complete rounds. That said, Louis clearly did struggle with an aggressive fighter who relentlessly got inside and was good at ducking, clinching, bulling, mauling, and fighting on the inside, which to some could be evidence that Louis could have a tough time beating guys like Tom Sharkey, Jim Flynn, Jack Dempsey, Rocky Marciano, etc. Certainly though, Louis improved in the rematch, as he always did.