Joe Louis vs. Tyson Fury

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, May 17, 2016.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
    It basically is to be honest, and that is coming from somebody who never rated his skill.

    Being big on its own won’t get you anywhere against Wlad.

    Fury isn’t even particularly hard hitting or durable for his size.

    He won that fight because he was awkward, and had a few layers to his game.
     
  2. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

     
  3. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    Fury is more durable then given credit for he only ever went down due to balance issues and showed exceptional recovery powers every time by getting up immediately and instantly recovering
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  5. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  7. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

     
  8. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,257
    23,948
    Jul 21, 2012
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  10. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

     
  11. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Why is Langford beyond Joe Louis?
     
  12. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    Because God made him greater
     
  13. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    Oops got my threads mixed up ha ha

    Anyway both Fury and Langford beat Joe Louis
     
  14. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Fury, a young and inexperienced hwt, beats the universal No 1 or 2 greatest hwt ever to live? Louis would kill him.
     
  15. Rothschild

    Rothschild Guest

    No way Louis is number 1 or 2 heavyweight or beats Fury don't cry and make up lies because you've been exposed believing in nonsense