Joe Louis Vs. Wladimir Klitschko

ATG rankings aren't about your h2h fantasies. but about what a fighter accomplished against his contemporaries and what they accomplished. This is what you need to learn instead of trying to imagine how one fighter would do against another from different era's.

 

My only real problems are Dempsey, Corbett and Fitz all ranking to highly.

 

He's certainly more exciting to watch than the Klits. Funny you would search back through nearly 8 months of my posts just to stalk me because you got nothing to argue with against me here!

 

What is your point stalker boy?

 

Yet I'm not the one going through months and months of someone elses post history searching for crumbs to use against them! :rofl

 

I agree on those, but also Jack Johnson and James Jeffries. Both were clearly the best of their era, but even taking the context of eras into account, I would struggle to put them into a top 10 when Lewis, Holy and Tyson are left out. Also in fairness, Wlad in particular has done enough to merit a top 20 berth.

My 2c...

 

Yeah, for me H2H plays no part in rankings since it's too open to speculation and subjectivity.

 

While I don't hold Johnson's title reign in high regard, he's a top 10 fighter given his resume....imo. Jeffries wouldn't make MY top 10 and Wlad is inside the top 20 now and rising. Here is a list of mine from a while back.

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

SUUURE it did stalker boy! :yep

 

Yep, another Klitard reduced to trolling because he van offer no argument for the topic on hand. You guys are so easy! :good

 

Pretty sure the thread title says it all.

 

Go back and look. You seem to be an expert at going through my post history! :yep

 

Nah, I don't think so.

 

Pretty solid. :good