Joe Louis's live fire exhibitions

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Jul 12, 2009.


  1. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009
    Pat did not announce a retirement until AFTER being knocked out by Louis. Presumably fighters are not retired until they have had their last fight. The bout with Louis would have taken a few weeks to set up. since it took place six weeks after Valentino’s title fight do you think Pat had a one week retirement before making a comeback to fight Louis?

    I assume Valentino passed a medical examination from the commission before taking part in his fight with Louis. I am curious about the sanctioning of a one eyed fighter against the unbeaten champion being allowed.

    It is easy to assume because he went blind in one eye after “his last fight” that it was the Charles fight because that was his last recorded “official” fight. Seeing as Pat was knocked out two months later by Joe Louis in a public fight isn’t it plausible there could be some confusion as to which was really “the last fight”?

    Since the announcement of retirement came Only after the Louis bout (instead of after the title fight) who knows what way round it was?
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2020
    Pedro_El_Chef and barberboy2 like this.
  2. SolomonDeedes

    SolomonDeedes Active Member Full Member

    1,420
    2,228
    Nov 15, 2011
    No, because when Valentino later sued his manager for unpaid earnings he testified that he had undergone an operation for a detached retina nine months before the Ezzard Charles fight, and that when he faced Louis he was completely blind in his right eye.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    His last fight was against Charles!lol
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    See post below!
     
  5. Sting like a bean

    Sting like a bean Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,047
    1,594
    Apr 9, 2017
    Holy ****, aside from being fascinating reading, the article in the first link shares the page with an add for sunglasses that cost $1.95 -supposedly marked down from $8.50. That's quite a bit of money (for sunglasses) in 1950, and I thought sunglasses at that time were still more rare than televisions in homes. (I don't think I ever saw anyone wearing sunglasses in an I Love Lucy rerun.)
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.