Joe Walcott .Vs. Joe Frazier

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Aug 20, 2008.


  1. Woller

    Woller Active Member Full Member

    1,372
    315
    Nov 24, 2005
    Frazier winning on a KO between rounds 3 and 6.

    Woller
     
  2. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007
    I feel that the first sentence above is very astute.

    If a boxer cannot hurt Frazier sufficiently to keep Joe away, then they are inevitably doomed. (Ali being the exception, imo)

    I think Walcott would have very fortunate to make it to the 10th round against prime Frazier. It might well be over by the 7th.
     
  3. Rattler

    Rattler Middle Aged Man Full Member

    3,925
    18
    Feb 9, 2005
    Walcott is more than crafty enough to take it the distance, but at some point, Frazier gets a few 10-8 rounds by way of the overhand left hook and wins a close decision - 143-140 / 8-7
     
  4. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    58
    Nov 28, 2007

    Hard to stay crafty when your liver is falling out.

    10 rounds, tops.
     
  5. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Frazier does better with purely boxer types than Marciano. Frazier late TKO.
     
  6. DaveK

    DaveK Vicious & Malicious Full Member

    3,668
    35
    Mar 2, 2009
    For some reason I see Walcott really troubling Frazier, at least until later on...

    Walcott can be slick, he hits plenty hard enough, and he clinches appropriately, which would be a main factor in his getting offense off while stopping Frazier's rhythm. He did it well against Marciano, and I think it would serve him well against Frazier as well.

    Like most others, I think Frazier grinds him down and ends up putting some clean and pivotal punches together to score a knockout, somewhere around 12.