Joel Casamyor V Naseem Hamed

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TIGEREDGE, Jun 6, 2009.


  1. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    i fancy the cuban all the way. too much size and skill
     
  2. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    I'm almost certain Casamayor's consistent dirty fighting would bother Naseem. He certainly didn't like the rough stuff from McCullough or Soto.
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Very tough matchup for Naseem. Casamayor was rough, wiley, had a good range-seeking jab with the lovely left straight following it.

    Also possesed with a fantastic set of whiskers.

    Casamayor Decision Prime for Prime, though you can never count out a man of Naseem Hamed's power and awkwardness.
     
  4. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,518
    10,396
    Jun 23, 2008
    Casa woulda beaten the living **** outta that fraud.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    Hamed was a small 5'4 featherweight who moved up from Bantam so Casa's rangyness and speed presents a problem. At their best both are very slick, that is something that is seriously underrated in Hamed's ability. Casa could also be ahead and get caught with a huge shot, and more often than not Hamed had a way of springing unorthodox brutal hayemakers out of nowhere.

    Its a really hard fight to predict, but I think a prime Hamed is a greater talent than Casamayor
     
  6. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I have to say although short Hamed was a beast of a FW. His legs were like tree trunks (of course a major factor in his punching power)

    He was a teenager at Fly, Bantam and Super Bantam. He was clearly a natural Feather. Casamayor at his best at 130 though, so is this fight agreed for a 128 lb catchweight???