John Ruiz Appreciation Thread

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, May 8, 2011.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,653
    44,571
    Feb 11, 2005
    I will say this, having spent time in Joe Hipp's neck of the woods, and having heard plenty stories of him. He was not to be trifled with and would be about the last guy you would want to get into a real fight with. If it weren't for his tender skin and less than spartan training habits, he would have been more of a force in the 90's. Tough, tough dude.
     
    Charles White likes this.
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,841
    3,073
    Apr 16, 2005
    Exactly. Ruiz was a disgrace to boxing. He held excessively in virtually every fight he had above the tomato can level, and blatantly faked low blows in others to get convenient point deductions and in one case (Johnson) to force a DQ. Ruiz is on a par with Luis Santana as one of the most undeserved cheaters to ever "win" a world title.
     
  3. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,069
    1,288
    Jan 1, 2011
    Seamus, I agree with you. I'm tired of the world picking on Ruiz. The guy was very game, and much better than given credit for. He arguably beat Valuev and Chagaev. He was in the upper echelons of the sport for about a decade. Sure, he had his problems, but the point is to win, and he usually did. I think it takes a lot of mental toughness too, to be so reviled and yet perservere in the way that he did. I was at MSG when Golota had him down twice, but Ruiz got up and attacked his way to a controversial victory. There are lots and lots of worse fighters out there.
     
  4. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    A serious question about Ruiz is, how much better could he have been with a top notch trainer? As colorful as Norman Stone was, he was a cheerleader only who did his fighter no favors by helping him readjust between rounds. Could another trainer have gotten more from Ruiz' determined, but meager talent?
     
  5. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    Ruiz like Rocky? That's borderline blasphemous if you ask me.

    Even though it's the movies, I'd never put Rocky and Ruiz in the same sentence. Rocky never whined or complained to the ref. Rocky never faked low blows or excessively held his opponents. If you ask me, Ruiz did a whole lot more acting his entire fight career than Rocky did in his 8 fight movie career.
     
    Entaowed likes this.
  6. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    Wow!:yikes
     
  7. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    38
    Jul 6, 2005
    Ruiz was boxings cockroach. He should have never been allowed back into the sport after Holyfield beat him three times but only managed to get one win. He also lost to a shot Golota as well but got the nod there and lost to Toney but retained the title on a steroids NC.
     
  8. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    66
    Aug 18, 2009
    No , they won't . Not even Jeffries . Jeffries would have made the 190 so easily , he would have stayed there . If Holyfield and Kirk Johnson didn't manhadndle him , forget about Jack Johnson manhandling him.
    If Jeffries lived in our era , he would have had better technique , better training , and better junk food and sugar flooded drinks. He would have looked like a white version of Jason Estrada :yep
     
  9. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    38
    Jul 6, 2005
    Ridiculous. Ruiz wasn't any better or stronger or more fit above 190 (where he lost to kobozev) when he moved up to hw. Do you think sergei was any better or stronger than jwffries? Or that sugar was only invented in 1990s for that matter? Did you ever see anyone outmuscle even an old johnson? I didn't. John ruiz, whose greatest asset was his ability to fall down clutching his nuts, never saw the day he would have beaten a great fighter.
     
  10. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Ruiz was boring as hell and robbed multiple opponents of victories thanks to his connections with Don King. No kudos for him.
     
  11. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    287
    Apr 18, 2007
    Yes, and that's something which shouldn't be overlooked. He somehow managed to lose his title in the ring decisively to two different aging former MW champions, steroids or not.
     
  12. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    66
    Aug 18, 2009
    Did you watch Ruiz-Kobozev ? this argument is about manhandling .
    Was that how Kobozev "beat" him ?
    Sugar was available in Johnson's time , but not the HFCS , super high carbohydrate junk foods , etc. Also not the same snacks.
     
  13. amhlilhaus

    amhlilhaus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,840
    12
    Mar 24, 2005
    lol! hey are you still going to do that book?

    as for ruiz he did what he did to win, at the tail end of his career he opened back up trying to fight a more crowd pleasing style, but most american fans had written him off by then. losing a md and a sd in the notoriously corrupt and impossible to beat the hometown fighter germany is probably a win in both cases, and the ud to valuev was possibly a robbery as well.

    but people just want to replay tua over and over again. I say the same about wlad with purrity, sanders, brewster.............
     
  14. shanahan14

    shanahan14 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,488
    731
    Jul 5, 2011
    Complete joke. Beat an old Holyfield and bitched everytime he lost a decision. Sure he lost some close ones, but like James Toney's career, he won some close ones.
     
  15. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007