John Ruiz wins wrestling match!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by AJAX, Mar 8, 2008.


  1. AJAX

    AJAX war sonnen! Full Member

    8,123
    1
    Aug 25, 2006
    Apperently the "old" John Ruiz is back after out wrestling Jameel Mcline for a UD. The fans were booing loudly and entertaing themselves by mocking the fighters. I didn't actually see the fight but that sounds accurrate, I swear Ruiz is out to ruin boxing and is doing a dam good job at it.
     
  2. markbrooklyn

    markbrooklyn Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,039
    2
    Aug 5, 2006
    **** John Ruiz. He's not gonna be back on television I don't think.. Nobody wants to see that bum.
     
  3. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    I'm really not surprised he WWE'd McCline. I thought that McCline would be able to catch him trying some wrestling **** but I guess not.

    Something tells me he plans on doing the same thing to Sam Peter. :-( The ****ing clown he is.
     
  4. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Has he every won any other way:lol:
     
  5. AJAX

    AJAX war sonnen! Full Member

    8,123
    1
    Aug 25, 2006
    yep, faked low blows and has got undeserved decisions
     
  6. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    the thing that i cannot understand is why promoter keeps putting him in a ring!!! so he said that he is john ruiz version2. so the hell what? it doesn't mean he would suddenly be great after he said that. he was **** before and is still **** now. you cannot make me watch him ever again.
     
  7. Marquito_666

    Marquito_666 ESB“s #1 **** star Full Member

    408
    0
    Nov 8, 2005
    *sigh*
    Not again...I thought we got rid of Ruiz once and for all.
    Let´s see who retires him for good this time.
     
  8. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    This is very true...I stand corrected:good