John Ryder vs Eamonn O'Kane

Ryder pretty much put a beating on him. But he is fairly limited and I would still favor Saunders to beat him.

 

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xvpr7a_2012-12-08-john-ryder-vs-eamonn-o-kane_sport#.UYlQsrXryJM

 

That was not the performance of a fairly limited fighter.

 

What is up with O'Kane?

He doesn't throw any straight punches. I can't understand why he doesn't see the futility of this approach. Shocking for a man with so much amateur experience.

 

Why is he a 'fairly limited fighter'? Break it down:good

 

Lacks allot of fundamentals. Doesn't have a great defense. Doesn't have a great jab. Is a big puncher but not huge.

Kind of reminds me of a Middleweight John Murray.

 

If that post was entered into a **** take competition, it would be disqualified for taking the ****.

 

in fairness I have only seen him in one real fight and cant really remember it.

 

I was really disappointed with O'Kane in that fight. Seemed to be just intent on bullying Ryder and just landing big shots. Wasn't like the O'Kane I remember from previous fights. Have to say though Ryder boxed very well in what could of been a very tough fight he didn't let O'Kanes' bullying tactics get anywhere. Thought he would of pushed on a bit from then as well.