Okay you think Bell would beat Truscott i think Truscott beats Bell, But you think Simpson beats Choi and thats just daft really.
You mean the power your man truscott didnt have? and never will. Dont know what you got against john and you keep going on about him not moving up in class ive explained to you a thousand times now and it still doesnt seem to register!!
Got nothing against John think hes a terrific fighter and a nice lad went to see him after he beat our Paul after the fight and hes a nice lad, all i am saying is that Steven Bell isnt a step up from Truscott.
He definately wants the winner of lindsay-arthur(lindsay late stoppage IMO) as he wants the lonsdale belt outright and only needs 1 more defence to do that. After that then the european
I know its not but as i explained to you john had no choice but to fight bell as he was ORDERED by the BBBC as he had signed to fight bell way back in march and FW had kept the contract and took it to the BBBC the day before the purse bids for the lindsay fight. he hadno idea about the bell fight till it was made. as you said he could have vacated but he still wouldnt have got a shot at lindsay until he fought bell so what was he meant to do? Also everyone needs to earn a living john has a family to support with another baby due very shortly so it was another payday for him before he gets a shot at lindsay. Hope this time you understand why he fought bell
Bell was actually cotracted to fight Simpson before the Truscott rematch and was 'asked' to sidestep for the rematch to happen. Bell deserved his shot