John Tate v Shannon Briggs

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus, Jan 15, 2020.


  1. Eye of Timaeus

    Eye of Timaeus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,860
    1,083
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Sep 1, 2019
    I've got Tate on points. Thoughts?
     
  2. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,177
    4,840
    Sportsbook:
    39
    Oct 4, 2016
    Interesting,, Tate was the better overall
     
  3. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,273
    3,071
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 23, 2019
    Tate was the better fighter, imo. The problem is, Briggs had a really good shot, certainly he could knock Tate as hard as Berbick did (not sure about that terrifying hook Weaver landed at the end).

    Tate UD, but Briggs had the power to ko him.
     
  4. Fergy

    Fergy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,616
    6,227
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 8, 2017
    Tate should really win,, but can we rule out Shannon launching a desperate, behind on the cards shot.
     
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    40,634
    3,800
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    Tate was the better boxer but I don’t trust his chin..
     


Sign up for ESPN+ and Stream Live Sports! Advertisement