John Tate v Shannon Briggs

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:27 PM.


  1. Eye of Timaeus

    Eye of Timaeus Active Member Full Member

    836
    430
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Sep 1, 2019
  2. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,019
    3,157
    Sportsbook:
    40
    Oct 4, 2016
    Interesting,, Tate was the better overall
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    51,263
    9,883
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Nov 24, 2005
  4. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,198
    1,702
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Mar 23, 2019
    Tate was the better fighter, imo. The problem is, Briggs had a really good shot, certainly he could knock Tate as hard as Berbick did (not sure about that terrifying hook Weaver landed at the end).

    Tate UD, but Briggs had the power to ko him.
     
  5. Fergy

    Fergy Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,387
    4,811
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 8, 2017
    Tate should really win,, but can we rule out Shannon launching a desperate, behind on the cards shot.
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    39,222
    1,226
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    Tate was the better boxer but I don’t trust his chin..
     


Sign up for ESPN+ and Stream Live Sports! Advertisement