Johnson on Dempsey-nice titbits here.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mattdonnellon, Apr 6, 2013.


  1. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    PARIS. April 20.— (UP)-1933
    Dempsey, In the opinion of Jack
    Johnson, was a palooka. who could
    never have beaten Jim Corbett, Bob
    Fitzsimmons or Jim Jeffries.
    Moreover, the modest Negro ex-heavywelght champion writes in a
    current Paris journal. Dempsey
    would have been a set-up for Jack
    Johnson In his prime. On one occasion in New York during an exhibition bout, Johnson asserts, he
    broke one of Dempsey's ribs after
    four rounds of fighting, and that
    thereafter the Manassa Mauler steered clear of him ,as he did of Harry
    Greb.
    "Dempsey's one great power,"
    Johnson's article states, "was the
    most adroit of managers, Jack
    Kearns. As soon as they separated,
    Dempsey's defeat was inevitable.
    "Dempsey never encountered any
    of the 'classic' boxers of the past.
    For example, Corbett would have
    proved much too slippery. Dempsey
    could never have placed his right on
    Corbett, and thus he would never
    have been in a position to deliver
    his only fairly, powerful left. In
    four or five rounds. Corbett would
    have closed Dempsey's eyes.
    "Dempsey never would have had a
    chance against an agile, slippery opponent. This was shown several
    times, and before he was defeated by
    Tunney. • Once during his training
    I saw Joe Gans make him look
    ridiculous. Harry Greb also made
    him look like an amateur.
    "The 'manklller' reputation Dempsey acquired was adroitly built up by
    Kearns, but It was a myth so far as
    his ability was concerned. He was a
    good puncher, moderately fast, but
    it Is absurd to class him with Sam
    Langford, Peter Maher, Fltzsimmions
    or even myself at my best, if I may
    say so.
     
  2. xRedx

    xRedx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,322
    10
    Dec 17, 2012
    Mike Tyson respected Jack Dempsey. Johnson's arguments are thus negated.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,200
    21,706
    Sep 15, 2009
    How anyone can hold a man in such high steen when he got one bombed by a fireman is beyond me :lol:
     
  4. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    And he wasn't even a fireman!
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,200
    21,706
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well that's even worse!

    Dempsey just dropped 8 places to number 79
     
  6. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Mike Bruce, Gypsy Daniels, Haines, Cardiff, Cox, Banks, Lowry, Hall, Marshall, Puritty, Isaac, well Flynn deserves his place in this Hall-of-Flame.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,200
    21,706
    Sep 15, 2009
    All joking aside I wonder why Johnson held Dempsey in such low esteem. I mean gibbons fits the description and Dempsey dominated him by all accounts. I know miske gave him trouble though.

    Then again I guess that's how boxing works eh, only recently Lewis has been saying wlad would never have been champ in his era. I'd take it with a pinch of salt of course.

    Johnson v Dempsey would have been great to see. Could Dempsey outwork Johnson with his aggressive attacks, or would jack pick him apart with that punishing lead uppercut.

    Never before heard he broke his ribs but it's interesting to note he accused him of ducking Greb.

    Nice to see a shoutout for Maher as well, seems he's the forgotten mam of that era.
     
  8. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    Maher probably was the biggest hitter of that period a la Shavers. Johnson liked him, Maher for his part fought more good black heavyweights than anybody pre-Marciano. I dunno, Gibbons was no Johnson, both good boxers but Jack bigger, much stronger, heavier and probably a bigger puncher. Be a great fight though v Jack Dempsey, as he would sure as Hell get Johnson out of his comfort zone and we'd know for sure just how good he was.
     
  9. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,244
    2,185
    Jun 24, 2007
    Jack was tough but it always bothered me that he didn't fight the top black fighters and he was inactive for 2 years.The first slick fighter he did fight was Tunney and we all know that story.But the thread is accurate in that his manager was very smart and back then people believed what they read.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,200
    21,706
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'd rate gibbons above Corbett though.
     
  11. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,617
    1,884
    Dec 2, 2006
    I'm not sure I would, Corbett hung tough with better big punching Heavyweight punchers in Jeffries, Sullivan, Sharkey and also with smaller punchers like Fitz , and Choynsky.
     
  12. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Jack Johnson was a con artist who is not to be taken too seriously as an
    unbiased boxing observer.For EXAMPLE his article above states "once during his [Dempsey's] training, I saw JOE GANS make him [Dempsey] look ridiculous ",Unquote....The only problem with this Jack Johnson nonsense is that the LW Joe Gans DIED in 1910 from tuberculosis, years before Dempsey turned pro......Maybe Johnson was refering to the ghost of Joe Gans....?
     
  13. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    This B.S. propaganda that Jack Dempsey did not fight the TOP black FIGHTERS [plural] in his title reign has to be rebutted time and again....The ONLY viable black heavyweight threat during the early 1920s, before Dempsey went Hollywood, was Harry Wills who even then was in his early 30s...Though they did sign with a Michigan promotor...Sam McVea, Sam Langford, Jack Johnson, Joe Jeannette were pushing 40 by then and were retired....So let's be real ... Would Dempsey fight the above black fighters were they in their 20s and active is purely hypothetical....But
    until I started on the internet the only black viable heavyweight Dempsey
    did not fight was the DESERVING Harry Wills, and acknowleged by the boxing writers of those times....There is no fighter on ESB that get's
    such a lacing from some posters that the Manassa Mauler gets...
    Too darn bad giving the shaft to a beloved figure that Dempsey was for
    over 50 long years...Shame...,
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,450
    45,959
    Feb 11, 2005
    He held everyone not named John Arthur Johnson in low esteem.

    This content is protected
     
  15. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Touche'