Jones' Heavyweight win vs. Fitzsimmons Heavyweight win

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mind Reader, Mar 3, 2010.


  1. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    I thought this would be an interesting thread, I have studied up on Fitz recently and when he won the Heavyweight title. Watched a few video's although not very good quality.

    I have heard Roy critics say his victory was not the same as Fitz's because Fitz beat "The" Heavyweight champ and Roy just beat a belt holder.

    So I looked at the sizes and weights of each fighter and came up with some interesting facts.

    Fitz won his Heavyweight championship against Gentleman Jim Corbett, who was a very small Heavyweight by today's standards, not known for punching power. Actually today he would have been a Cruiserweight.

    Jim weighed in at 184 lbs, compared to 167 for Fitz. That is a 17 lb difference.

    Jim stood at 6' 1" compared to Fits who was 5' 11" and a half.
    That is a 1 and a half inch height advantage for Jim.

    Jim's reach was 73" inches compared to Fitz's 71" and a half.... Again that is a 1 and a half inch reach advantage for Jim.


    Roy weighed in against Ruiz at 193 but I believe he was actually around 200, compared to 226 for Ruiz for a 26 lb weight advantage for Ruiz.

    Roy also gave up a 3 inch height advantage to Ruiz, who stood at 6 2"

    Roy also gave up a 4 inch reach advantage to Ruiz who's reach is 78"

    Now if Roy went up against "the" heavyweight champ as Fitz did,(Against Lennox Lewis) He would be giving up..

    6 inches of height, 10 inches of reach, and nearly 50 lbs in weight.


    I am not trying to discredit either guy, but I think Roy beating Ruiz, who actually had a marginal size difference over Roy greater than the size Fitz gave up against Gentleman Jim, was at least comparable to Fitz' win, even though Ruiz was not the best Heavyweight in the world, but was a title holder.

    Any thoughts?
     
  2. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    LBS don't make much of a difference the way Roy fights/fought.
     
  3. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    I just believe the victories are in the same boat.... Some critics don't give Roy as much credit because Ruiz was not "the" heavyweight champ.

    But at the same time, Roy obviously lived in a era of mammoth heavyweights, and no 184 pound man history could beat Lennox Lewis, so I think Roy deserves a little bit of slack there, obviously it was much harder to win "the" Heavyweight title in Roy's era, and that has to count for something.

    Beating Ruiz, who held more of a size advantage over Roy has to be in the same ballpark as Fitz beating Corbett who was actually more of a modern Cruiserweight than a Heavyweight.
     
  4. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Jones beat a contender for he championship. Fitz beat the champ. Fitz although beat an atg. Jones beat, well, Ruiz. Huge difference. Asido of that Fitz cleaned out the hw division, Jones had one fight.
     
  5. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008

    :lol::good
     
  6. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009
    fitzsimmons by brutal 1st round ko ;)
     
  7. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006

    Wow.... You missed the whole point of the thread.

    And Fitz hardly Cleaned out the heavyweight division.
     
  8. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    :rofl:rofl
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I did not miss the point of the thread. It's just bull****.

    He beat all the top contenders of his time but Choinsky (that was a draw) and Jeffries. When he fought Johnson he was already 44 ...
     
  10. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    Well you gotta rank Fitzsimmons win higher as he was facing the true champion and the man regarded as the best heavyweight in the world. Jones picked a fighter who suited his style and while an impressive feat wasn't the toughest option available.

    While the numbers suggest their was little difference numbers don't always tell the full story. And if you are simply gonna go for size then you can't ignore the fact that Fitzsimmons fought a number of heavyweights a few who outweighed Ruiz.
     
  11. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006

    I am not trying to compare Roy's one heavyweight match against all of Fitz's heavyweight fights..... I believe Choynski was a LHW when they fought.

    I was comparing when Roy won a belt from Ruiz, and when Fitz beat James Corbett, the size differences, and also the difference that Roy beating the "true" heavyweight champ of his era, would have been a much more impressive feat than that of Fitz beating Corbett, who wasn't very much larger than him at all.
     
  12. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,031
    18,307
    Jul 29, 2004
    Corbett was a career heavyweight...about the same age as Roy was beating Toney at supermiddleweight, Fitz was fighting at welterweight.
    He was not a big guy..He was a lean, stringy guy and he stacked on the weight simply because there was more money at the higher weights.

    They fought in completely different eras, so the size comparison isnt all that valid. Ruiz was prevented from using his size and strength by Nady because he jumped in pretty much whenever the fight got close...In Fitz's era Corbett would have been allowed to use his size up close a lot more because of the amount of holding, wrestling and mauling that was prevalent in boxing in that era.

    Roy beat Ruiz in a glorified sparring session...Fitz beat Corbett in a real life and death fight.
     
  13. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006

    This is a good post...

    You are right about fighting back in the day there was a lot more holding and wrestling involved in the fights.

    Would Roy beating Lennox be more impressive than Fitz beating Corbett?
     
  14. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,116
    Apr 16, 2005
    Exactly. Jones picked the weakest, least talented HW belt-holder at the time. Fitzsimmons beat one of the greatest HWs of his era. No comparison.
     
  15. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,031
    18,307
    Jul 29, 2004
    Yes