Jones vs Hopkins - who wins today?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ChrisPontius, Jan 23, 2008.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    In 1994 it was a clear victory for Jones. I think it would have been any time up to 2003, but after that, Hopkins clearly was better. Who takes it today?
     
  2. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
  3. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,761
    337
    Aug 4, 2007
    I don't know but i do know that i would be interested because of who they are but at the same time, i know that it could be a snooze fest.
     
  4. Paulie

    Paulie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,049
    0
    Oct 15, 2007
    Boring fight for $$$$$
     
  5. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Hopkins. I take Hopkins in a fight between them any time after the first fight.
     
  6. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    Something tells me Bernard won't ever be the same after Joe. RJJ is still quick enough to win without a flash KO.
     
  7. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Jones'handsped is enough to out point Hopkins .
     
  8. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    hopkins aged better so i'd take him by ud. the weight where they fight could be a big factor though
     
  9. KMSTAR

    KMSTAR Member Full Member

    286
    0
    May 12, 2006
    Hopkins is a rough fighter, though not a big puncher. This fight is all wrong for the modern day Jones.
     
  10. Symphenyceo

    Symphenyceo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,778
    40
    Nov 16, 2007
    jones UD...bhops workrate is still lower than jones and roy's hands are still pretty fast
     
  11. Still~style

    Still~style Active Member Full Member

    930
    0
    Sep 4, 2007
    tough to call...both so old. i original thought jones could take it because hopkins workrate is poor...but when i think about it i only see roy jones getting mugged in the clinch and grimed out to a hopkins decision. didn't see jones's last fight either.
     
  12. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Hopkins anytime after 03. Jones anytime 2001 and before.
     
  13. prideofvbeach

    prideofvbeach Top 10 Pound-For-Pound Full Member

    2,557
    0
    Sep 26, 2007
    Hopkins would have been better to have taken this fight than Calzaghe. He's aged A LOT better than RJJ. If they met right now, I could not convcieve of a way that Jones would go the distance. This would end as a dramatic KO loss for RJJ almost as shocking as his loss to Tarver.
     
  14. albeziel

    albeziel Multi Viral C13 Full Member

    2,776
    0
    Dec 24, 2007
  15. Dorfmeister

    Dorfmeister Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,558
    6
    Aug 8, 2007
    Buddy McGirt is the latest one to come up with the idea that Roy's skills and smarts can make him prevail in this one and I won't question it... Just that Roy usually won fights with power-punching and throwing more punches - now, he affords to get behind in punch stats in the first 12, 15 minutes against an inactive fighter fighting above his weight like Tito, and he has limited power in counter-shots... The right hand landed short on the temple and the left lead was more of a push... Roy is in shape and flashy, accurate and creative as ever, just that extending that right hand to block and moving str8 back up step by step, he can't possibly compete for full three minutes rounds with Bernard... So if he can't steal rounds as easily as before, and it wasn't that easy the first time - 116-112 (8 rounds to 4) - he would have to stop Bernard with aggressiveness and non-stop punching now and that is completely out of the question.