Jones WOULD beat Hopkins TODAY.

I agree. People forget that Hopkins is a counter puncher. He's not an aggressive fighter at all. Stylistically Jones will always be a problem for him.

 

This has already been covered on here. Lacy was a stationary target for Jones to tee off on. Hopkins could afford to be aggressive against Roy and could, possibly, stop him. After his hammering at the hands off JC would anyone have said this? No, people are getting carried away with how Jones looked against a very limited, low confidence, damaged fighter.

 

Jones is done on the big stage....i think hopkins can still contend with some of the big names of the sport today, I dont think Jones can...

 

hmmmm, he has a chance, as anyone would with his hand speed, but i'd favour b-hop tbh.

 

Not a chance.

 

Sarah always makes these dumb kinds of threads where she makes a few bold, unfounded statements based on nothing but her need for attention.

 

dont go on how they lost to calzaghe ,jones lost easy and hopkins just lost due to the way they handled the awesome calzaghe`s style and hopkins style was better suited to handle calz.

jones v hopkins would be hard to call,it should happen.
(i would still favour hopkins though.)
​

 

If Roy had the confidence to beat Hopkins , he would have called him out. Jones hasn't picked fighters like Lacy and Green to feast on for no reason. It is to Roy's credit that at his age he looks pretty good in the ring, but he would surely lose rematches to Hopkins, Johnson or Tarver.

 

roy called him out it's in another thread and recorded
b-hop asked for 60-40
roy said lets do 60 for the winner and b-hop declined
roy said he thinks he can beat b-hop

 

No.

End of thread.

 

Sarah is an awful poster.

 

And an attention seeker.

 

nope roy has had nothing but problems with awkward people Tarver slappy johnson

 

lzdie