Jose luis castillo vs mayweather revisited. Who really won?

I agree it could've went either way but I did not agree with how Lederman scored the fight at all. He would give Castillo a round for landing one or two punches at the end of the round, it was a joke. He would forget what happened the first two and a half minutes of the round. A close round with a point deduction from Castillo is a 9-9 round but an equally close round with a FM point deduction is a 10-8? Like I said the fight could've gone either way but a poor scorecard from Lederman influenced the whole "robbery" argument.

 

According to all official sources: Mayweather won the fight.

 

Doesn't mean it was not a robbery sonny:hi:

 

A close fight isn't a robbery.

 

I scored the fight 10-2 to Castillo it was a robbery

 

lmao. silly *****

 

But you're opinion doesn't mean anything.

 

This fight is like that small little cozy blanket that small children carry all around the house with them all day.

Who'd have guessed beating the best lightweight of the decade in his prime was a bad thing? High standards, my friends. Very high standards...

 

90% of the jlc votes are boxing clowns ALTS, FACT

 

not as clearly as the 2nd hitman destroyed him

 

referee: Vic Drakulich | judge: Anek Hongtongkam 116-111 | judge: John Keane 115-111 | judge: Jerry Roth 115-111

Looks like Mayweather really won.

 

how did you not have it 13/0 jlc ?
he whooped him so bad he got extra credit. boxing clown
out of the first 6 rounds which did you score to jlc ?

egging on the troll

 

meatball:hi:

castillo won clearly FACT

 

referee: Vic Drakulich | judge: Anek Hongtongkam 116-111 | judge: John Keane 115-111 | judge: Jerry Roth 115-111