Jose Napoles v Iran Barkley

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Oct 25, 2014.


  1. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,568
    32,413
    Jan 14, 2022
    Obviously Napoles is a much better fighter than Barkley P4P, but this is just a case of the size being too much of a factor. I know Duran moved up and beat Barkley, but I don't think Napoles could carry the weight or was as effective as Duran was at higher weight classes.
     
    Jel likes this.
  2. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,834
    13,128
    Oct 20, 2017
    Unlike Duran, who fleshed out from lightweight to carry himself through 4 divisions, Napoles just didn’t have that kind of frame. He was a small welter and an even smaller middleweight, while Barkley was a big middleweight.

    Napoles was a greater fighter but doesn’t have credentials at 160. I think he’d be more competitive than he was with Monzon but I just don’t see him winning. A case of ‘bigger beats better’.
     
  3. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s Full Member

    19,215
    21,203
    Sep 22, 2021
    Wha- Napoles is probably better then any version of Duran let alone old man Roberto. He absolutely washes Iran out, Barkley won’t land squat. This is a grotesque mismatch!
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,457
    9,443
    Jul 15, 2008
    Napoles a much better fighter but Barkley a much bigger man ..