Jose Napoles v Pernell Whitaker @ 147

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Jul 30, 2014.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,135
    45,422
    Feb 11, 2005
    Mantequilla v Sweet Pea… I don't think Pernell would be able to convincingly outslick Jose and that this one would need meaningful exchanges to determine a winner.

    Who takes it over 15?
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,135
    45,422
    Feb 11, 2005
    OK, what if the fight took place at heavyweight?
     
    SHADAPBLAD and robert ungurean like this.
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,819
    47,707
    Mar 21, 2007
    EEeeeehhh, very very difficult. I think it's difficult because Whitaker at welterweight wasn't as special as he was elsewhere, although he was impressive enough against Giant De La Hoya, for example, to make me wonder. He is a real rhythm breaker, difficult to time and to control. Napoles? Very special but perhaps wants to be able to establish a bit of a strategic quilt either by default or with something particular in mind. Could he get that going against Whitaker?

    With Oscar, it didn't really matter, he just sort of trundled forwards and won (barely) on size almost regardless, but I think the shoe might be on the other foot here because it'd be Whitaker performing regardless, getting out when he wanted, choosing when exchanges take place. Would that be enough to get him home?

    Over fifteen rounds i'd make this one almost 50.50. Over twelve, I think that Napoles would probably just get out-clipped. Split decision for Pea.
     
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,180
    15,179
    Jun 9, 2007
    For me this really is a 50/50 call. At 147 I slightly lean towards Napoles.
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,406
    9,358
    Jul 15, 2008
    Excellent match up but at 147 I like Napoles who was far ether than Oscar ever was and 147 was not Whitaker's prime weight ..
     
  6. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,677
    2,557
    Oct 18, 2004
    Napoles beats Pernell on a strong unanimous decision, like 10-5.
     
  7. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    :lol:
     
  8. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,813
    Aug 26, 2011
    Napoles beats Whitaker 10-5 LOL.. What are you smoking? Whitaker takes this and I'm not sure it would be all THAT hard. A good fight no doubt, a tough one 2, but not an overly concerning style for Pea to deal with. For me, whitaker simply better, and that isnt' taking anything away from Napoles.
     
  9. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Then I take Napoles.
     
  10. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,677
    2,557
    Oct 18, 2004
    The good stuff,:lol:.They didn't call Jose Mantequilla for nothing, and Pernell would find this out real quick.Pernell is the man, but Napoles is one of the few fighters at the weight that I think could beat him.
     
  11. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,542
    Jul 28, 2004
    This is more like I see it, as Napoles was a totally different kettle of fish than anyone else Whitaker ever fought, and was superior as a welterweight. A couple of kds would nail it for Mantequilla,...and lets have none of that **** about cuts, as it wouldnt happen.
     
  12. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,542
    Jul 28, 2004
    Good choice LittleRed, as I would expect nothing less from you.:D
     
  13. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,813
    Aug 26, 2011
    I see, then do tell me who was of the class and style of Whitaker that Jose beat please?
     
  14. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Eddie Perkins ring a bell.
     
  15. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,813
    Aug 26, 2011
    So nobody then?