Joseph Parker v Rex Layne?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jan 24, 2019.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,721
    29,069
    Jun 2, 2006
    Who takes this?
     
  2. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    Best for best I think I'll pick Rex Layne.

    Beating Walcott is better than anything Parker has done. Parker has struggled with not the best opposition. He just doesn't doesn't seem able to up his game.
     
  3. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,899
    7,574
    Jul 18, 2018
    Layne by UD

    Might have to survive some early round bullying but he's taken Walcott and Satterfield's best blows and kept going
     
    RockyJim and mcvey like this.
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,721
    29,069
    Jun 2, 2006
    There is a lot to be said for your opinion here. My caveat is were the decisions Rex won over quality guys merited? The Walcott one seems to have been okay,the Charles one less so.
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2019
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,556
    27,182
    Feb 15, 2006
    This is how I see it!
     
    RockyJim likes this.
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,721
    29,069
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think he would outbox him, Layne had defensive deficiencies.and he would be the smaller guy here.Parker probably matches him for power too.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  7. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    I struggle to imagine a way Layne would win this!

    He's certainly not going to stop Parker, who has a very sound chin.

    Can't see him out-boxing him either, as he doesn't seem to have the skills, necessary to do that.

    From the footage I have seen of Layne, he appears to be more of a brawler than a boxer... so his only hope seems to be to out-maul Parker. I doubt he will have much luck with that, against a strong, durable opponent, who is some 40 lbs heavier than himself!
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2019
  8. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,574
    Jan 30, 2014
    Parker is much bigger and longer, and has faster hands and better skills & form.

    Layne would be target practice.
     
    GOAT Primo Carnera and Bukkake like this.
  9. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,493
    3,718
    Apr 20, 2010
    Edit: Sorry, wrong post
     
  10. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,632
    9,773
    Jun 9, 2010
    Interesting fantasy match-up. I think the obvious advantages to Parker are his size and his speed. But, I think his relative power is a little suspect and I also believe that he sacrifices both form and power, for the benefit of hand-speed, with his punches looking a little 'slappy', at times.

    Parker looks good early and appears to have all the tools, with a great, sharp jab and a fast right-hand. However, like a lot of the big heavyweights; especially, against high-end competition, he can start to look ragged, as the pace continues. An early finish would particularly suit Parker in this one, in my opinion.

    Layne is a slugger, but not an unintelligent one. From what I can tell, he was very happy, in close, and going to the body. Could Layne avoid an early stoppage; see out a difficult start and come on strong at the end? I can certainly imagine Layne making a fight of it and doing well in the second half of the bout, but we never saw him (to the best of my knowledge) in with a guy the size of Parker and most of Layne's bouts were over a 10-round distance. So, it's hard to speculate on what sort of shape he might be in by the championship rounds.

    Going by the known form and, if forced to bet, I'd back Parker. However, it's not one I'd be too keen to put money on and probably wouldn't.