Joseph Parker vs Hughie Fury who wins & why?

The thing is when you post, you in particular, I believe what you say. I respect what you say as to so much I even checked it out. When you said this...

I thought 'hell no' but I checked it out online to see if he was 5th and I found nothing official. So then I came on here and replied to your post. The point is, I believed your statement. See if you read my posts that either going to be facts or my opinions but you will be able to tell which is which. If I say something you know its going to be solid.

 

The word 'is' and 'behind'. You said Parker IS ranked BEHIND etc etc... Parker IS not ranked 5th behind so and so. Thats fact. To say he IS, is to present it as fact. Case closed right there.

Shall I bring up proof? Have you provided ANY proof?

 

Well im flattered if you respect what I say, eventhough I don't necessarily agree with you on this issue, the sentiment is returned.

Let me ask you, how did you go about verifying if my statement was correct or not?

Would you also be able to verify if blue is better than black too?

 

Show me where I said ranked in that post please.

 

You defintely skim read which can cause comprehension problems. Go back an read how I did that.

Changing the subject is a defeated response. Are we discussing black or blue? No. Its irrelevant.

 

You didnt say ranked in that post but it was in that context.

You see I set the record straight even if some may think it works against me. My points are fair and clear.

 

Are there any factual rankings that exist anywhere?

Im using a different example to highlight the absurd position your taking lol.

 

I didn't say it was my opinion but it was in that context, see I can be pendantic too.

My points are fair and clear too.

 

If they were I dont think we'd have these posts traded now would we

 

If you researched like I did, you would know the answer. Remember, I trusted your statement. Should I or we trust anything you say now?...Ill continue to read your post but Im not the one that set myself up. If you were fair and clear then Parker ranked 5th behind those names you mentioned would be easy to find officially but it was just your opinion and thats wasnt cleared up till later as Ive proved. Proof PROVES your points.

Absurd? Useless? Nah nothing heres like that. Its just a simple misunderstanding but Im trying to make it right. Thats all.

 

I don't know maybe they are and yours are not....

 

I have proof/evidence. You dont. You come to court with no proof lol! None what so ever!

You did bring subtle insults and attempts to change the subject (when it gets too hot get out the kitchen). That was expected though because I had a solid case.

 

If you can find me factual rankings that are not based on someones person or organisation's opinion, I will happily admit you are right on everything you have been saying on this issue.

Noone needs to believe anything I post, I'm not some dictator who is demanding everyone believe me, this is a forum where people express their opinion on boxing matters if you are looking for facts I recommend you go and read scientific and mathematical books.

 

Looooooool! Ahh man this is funny. I've got my proof you just refute it, just like I refute yours. So were at an impass, neither of us accept the others proof.

Lol I could accuse you of being subtly condescending but that's expected when people realise their solid case is actually not so solid.