Joseph Parker vs Rocky Marciano

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by baconmaker, Oct 27, 2016.


  1. baconmaker

    baconmaker Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,222
    728
    Apr 23, 2013
    Who wins? Parker vs Marciano
     
  2. Komaster

    Komaster Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,923
    26,102
    Sep 20, 2010
    This fight has a draw written all over it
     
  3. baconmaker

    baconmaker Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,222
    728
    Apr 23, 2013
    Takam put Parker into deep waters. So that means much better conditioned Marciano would KO Parker.
     
  4. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,486
    Apr 4, 2005
    I think Marciano is over rated but I think you're right. Unless Parker can KO him early I think Marciano will grind him down. He struggled with the pace and pressure Takam set and Marciano is on another level in this regard, if he can take him into the 2nd half of the fight then I think Parker gasses badly and is broken down and stopped.

    Parker really needs to prove a lot more before he can really be compared to any ATG.
     
  5. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    73,147
    39,636
    Sep 29, 2012
    Marcianos story has already been told, Parkers has just begun... Looks like a real talent but let's wait until the kid actually wins a title and defends it a couple of times before talking about he stands H2H against the greats.
     
    KiwiMan likes this.
  6. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,998
    12,324
    May 8, 2014
    Marciano weighed 185 goddamn pounds and he never fought a fast handed, skilled power punching SHW in his entire career. He's the one who never proved himself in this match up.
     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2016
    Absolutely! likes this.
  7. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,512
    3,310
    Oct 19, 2006
    185 pounds?? No chance against ANY Top Ten HW guy today.

    Comparing one era to another is worthless. Leave it alone.
     
    Lith likes this.
  8. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,486
    Apr 4, 2005
    Some will say Marciano was too small pointing out he was only 185lbs, but Holyfield and Haye were both once only 190lbs. Adamek was only 175lbs and despite not having power at heavyweight still garnered some decent wins over much bigger men. Is it so crazy that Marciano could beat a relatively unproven heavyweight like Parker?
     
  9. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,258
    23,951
    Jul 21, 2012
    Marciano could thow in 2 rounds what Parker struggles to throw over 12 rounds. His work rateand stamina is horrible.

    Rocky would be all over him. No contest
     
  10. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,143
    Apr 4, 2012
    A course of the roids Femi is on would soon have prime Rock at 220lbs lean.
     
  11. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    5,512
    3,310
    Oct 19, 2006
    185 pounds vs a whole Top 10 full of 6'4"-plus, 240lb monsters - most of them with speed, power, reach, height advantages multiplied.

    There is no comparison. Frankly, even Ali might struggle against today's best.

    Just sheer size, speed and power.
     
    NakiFan likes this.
  12. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,998
    12,324
    May 8, 2014
    Both Haye and Holyfield are over 6 foot and have relatively long frames which could support extra mass. They grew into their HW bodies as their careers progressed. Marciano was a dumpy little midget with trex arms who topped out at around 185.
     
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    I would have to pick Marciano.................
     
  14. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,486
    Apr 4, 2005
    True but what about other smaller fighters that have moved up and had success? Adamek is only 6'1" as was Byrd, Toney is 5'10" at the most and they all had success at heavyweight to a certain degree. RJJ also moved up despite his size and beat Ruiz, has Parker proved himself to be better than Ruiz with one win over Takam? I don't think so.

    While I think size can definitely be a factor Parker simply hasn't proven himself consistently enough to be favoured at this moment in time. What if Ruiz Jr blasts him out in his next fight? I am a Parker fan but one win over a decent opponent in Takam doesn't mean he's proven himself especially when he showed vulnerabilities in that fight to attributes Marciano possesses in spades.
     
  15. Absolutely!

    Absolutely! Fabulous, darling! Full Member

    8,707
    1,660
    Jul 8, 2010
    Does Parker do worse against Makabu than Takam? Makabu has a substantially better workrate. I don't know. Just a question to ponder, since no one seems to be taking into account the relative size of the opponents.