Joshua ''I Won't Sell My Soul For 50 million. I'm Not Here To Sell My Belts'' Confirmed Duck

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Sephiroth Rising 7, May 7, 2018.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    Have you ever bought or sold a house? When you receive an offer the first thing you do is say "yes I'm interested but I need to see proof of funds". :lol:

    It's standard practice.
     
  2. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    Yes wait another 20 years and the fight will be worth trillions :lol:
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    What other fight is Wilder going to make 12.5 million?
     
  4. MAJR

    MAJR Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,537
    412
    Jul 16, 2012
    There's probably no fight out there that could make 50million, but that doesn't mean other fights that would make Joshua a lot of money. He earned £10million against Takam, Povetkin or Miller would likely make similar amount, he is a proven box office draw.

    So you think it's preferable to take Wilder and his camp at their word and pretend Joshua is terrified of him because they have other options and aren't rushing to make the fight? I'm sorry, that make you a fanboy.

    Accusing professional fighters of being "scared shitless" of others because they're not doing business the way you want them to is fanboyism.

    Business often gets in the way or making fights, we failed to have many potentially great fights in history because the business wasn't right. It's not ideal, its not good for boxing, but it happens. It doesn't mean either man's scared of the other or ducking it just means the deal isn't right, the money's not right or the options aren't right. Fact of life.

    Going round pointing fingers shout "duck!" "scared shitless" that makes you a fanboy.
     
    Last edited: May 8, 2018
  5. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    Wilder has signed to fight Breazeale, he is afraid of Joshua for any amount of money....................might as well forget about Wilder fighting Joshua, Povetkin or anyone else who can fight..............
     
  6. pompier

    pompier Member Full Member

    187
    12
    Mar 4, 2006
    At this point either side is fighting to get there control of the event which means control of the country that is happening in, control of the ring size and other things that can influence the course of the fight.
    The promoter are just feeling the ground to see where the other is willing to go. In the procces everybody is talking about the fight which is making it a bigger fight. Anyways it is my opinion, it reminds me a bit of the Mayweather-Pacquiao sitiation but i do think the fight will be happening somewhere either at the end of 2018 or first half of 2019.
     
  7. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    The buyer doesn't send a contract in the first offer. If the offer is accepted the seller isn't binded to the sale of the property

    You will never write back and say I need to see proof of finances because I don't believe you have the money to fund this sale.

    This is would undoubtedly scupper any negotiations and the deal would fall through.

    Nevertheless Hearn has now said he never asked for proof of funds. AJ and the Hearns know the deal is real. All they have to do is push for the fight and it will happen just like they did with Klitschko. If they really wanted the fight to happen they wouldn't have offered flat fee offers to Wilder. They'd have given him the same deal they gave to Parker.

    Now wilder has called their bluff and backed them in a corner and they are contradicting themselves every day.

    Today they are talking about waiting a year before they think Joshua should take the fight. And I believe this is due to the fact that they are aware that the roids would have been completely flushed out of AJ's system by that time. He will then be able to fight in the states in full confidence that the he won't get caught for cheating. They know full they test him thoroughly in the states and he'll end up like Canelo if he was to go over there during this period of time.

    And of course they don't want the fight, since their intention is to milk his brand and con the public to the limit, before he is thrown out to the lions.
     
  8. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    Lets get it right. He's being offered 50 million straight on the table for one fight.

    Over making that amount over a 5-7 year peroid in several fights receiving an accumulation of damage. What part doesn't make sense?

    He'd make at best 20 million fighting Povektin and Miller whilst losing the respect of the majority of real boxing fans who'd have seen him undertake one of the biggest ducks in boxing history.


    Make no mistake, only a moron that is filled with fear turns that kind of money down.

    Call me a fanboy for point out the obvious all you like, but you are the moron here. Anyone in their right mind would accept a one time payment of 50 million rather than try to make the same amount over a series of fights which you would inevitably have to accumulate more damage.
     
  9. khaosai galaxi

    khaosai galaxi Superbad Full Member

    2,979
    2,510
    Apr 17, 2017
    I don't get why wilder is so chicken**** to fight in England.
    It's for the undisputed fighting in front of almost 100000 people.
    The glory of knocking out the Champ in his own backyard.
    A no brainer for me.
     
  10. khaosai galaxi

    khaosai galaxi Superbad Full Member

    2,979
    2,510
    Apr 17, 2017
    I don't get why wilder is so chicken**** to fight in England.
    It's for the undisputed fighting in front of almost 100000 people.
    The glory of knocking out the Champ in his own backyard.
    A no brainer for me.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    I was surprised by so many people talking as if Shelly Finkel and Al Haymon could not possibly have the 50 million dollars. Stranger things have happened, and neither Finkel nor Haymon are known as being completely amateurs or cowboys, as Eddie Hearn implies.
    Finkel's been involved in big-time boxing when Eddie Hearn was just a baby. Finkel was involved in big time boxing years before Barry Hearn became a boxing promoter.
    If Finkel is making such huge false offers or allowing such huge false offers to be made with his name, then he needs to retire his old ass now.
    Al Haymon has a good record of finding funds.

    I'd tend to give them the benefit of the doubt.
     
    305th likes this.
  12. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    Of course it isn't a false offer.

    Dear Eddie,

    With all due respect you know Al and I for a long time and you know this is not a publicity stunt. I assure you that we’re serious and we would be glad to sit down with you and provide proper security for the funding and work out all the details.

    But it all has to start with Anthony Joshua accepting the $50million offer that he asked for, which is also by far the largest guarantee and largest purse any heavyweight champion in history has ever made.

    Until then, it would be non-productive to meet. Please have Anthony accept the offer that he asked for and let’s get this fight made.


    You know as well as us how a big fight is made. First an offer is made and if the offer is accepted, a contract will follow.

    You saying we didn’t even send you a contract is a smoke screen. Your own recent actions will bare me out.

    1-you made us an offer for Deontay to fight Anthony Joshua. This is for the same fight that we made an offer to Joshua, the only difference was that you made an offer to Deontay first. In your offer to Deontay, did you include a contract? No. Why? Because Deontay never accepted your offer.

    2-you recently made us an offer for Deontay to fight another one of your fighters, Dillon Whyte. Did you include a contract? No. Why because Deontay did not accept your offer.

    3- You made an offer to Wladimir Klitschko to fight Anthony Joshua, did you send a contract? No. After some negotiations Wladimir accepted a revised offer and then is when you sent a contract to us.

    How can you complain that you have not received a contract from us, when your own actions prove that is not how a deal is done in boxing. If Anthony agrees to accept our offer, we will be glad to supply you with a contract, proof of funds and any other relevant data needed to complete the contract.

    Thanks,
    Shelly

     
  13. MAJR

    MAJR Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,537
    412
    Jul 16, 2012
    Boxing is as much a business as it is a sport, if not more so nowadays, and if the business is right fights will happen, if it isn't they wont. Simple. Accusations of "ducking" or being "scare shitless" fail to recognize that.

    In business terms, Joshua doesn't need Wilder. His fight against Takam made him 10million, his fight against Parker 20million, a potential fight against Povetkin or Miller would make him millions more. No other fight out there would make 50million in one go but the point is that he's hardly strapped for cash or limited in lucrative options.

    In business terms Wilder, on the hand, needs Joshua. He earned 1.4million against Stivern and 2.1million against Ortiz, he's not making big money for a World Heavyweight Champion and he doesn't have any options out there which would make even a quarter what he could make against Joshua.

    This is reflective of both men's career progression to date. Joshua has sought out and delivered the big fights and title unification, Wilder has not. As a result, Joshua is a proven box office draw while Wilder isn't, and Joshua has more big money options than Wilder.
     
  14. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    Joshua in order to be taken seriously needs Wilder who has the WBC green and gold legendary belt. In many people's eyes he still remains a paper champion after buying the IBF belt off Charles martin and beating an ancient Wlad doesn't impress the true boxing purists.

    The paying public will begin to grow tired of watching him knock down bums and old men past their prime.

    You can't justify turning down a win, lose or draw 50 million payday. It doesn't make any business sense financially whatsoever and you are only going to continue making yourself look like a fool trying to appear as if there is more financial lucrative route. It's ******ed. We're talking about the highest purse in the history of the sport in the Heavyweight division.

    Conor Mcgregor didn't turn down 100 million even though he could have chosen to remain making handsome sums fighting midgets in UFC. However he understood when a ridiculous offer like that comes along, from a business perspective you do not turn it down.

    The difference is he wasn't more afraid of losing then he was of losing out on profit. The fear with Joshua comes from dealing with the fallout when he losses. He can no longer be marketed as this unstoppable wrecking ball force of nature who is the greatest HW since Mike Tyson and Muhammed Ali.
     
  15. Holler

    Holler What a cocky saucy ****** this one is Full Member

    13,702
    26,198
    Mar 12, 2018
    You sir:

    are full of it...

    I said, consistently, that Wilder should hold for a percentage, that 35% gets the fight signed, and the flat fee, whilst not paltry, was an opening salvo rather than the final offer.

    As attacking my knowledge of relevant commercial practice. If your in the boxing industry I defer to direct experience, there may be specific conventions I'm unaware of, although I've dealt with UK boxing businesses in the past and noted nothing unusual.

    Otherwise, I have direct experience of negotiation in comparable industries that negates your viewpoint. Deal points can be agreed beforehand, or they can be left on the table pending discussion of other matters. It's entirely a matter for the parties to the negotiation.

    What is unusual is to preclude meetings or even further discussions until one particular aspect is agreed. Likewise selectively leaking confidential communications to the media, potentially adding misinformation, the imposition of arbitrary or unrealistic deadlines or, on the opposing side, the frequent disrespect shown to opposing principals. None of which help to create the good faith and trust required to bring a succesful negotiation to fruition.

    If they accept a deal that has a sting in the tale they'll risk a media backlash that they would be wiser avoiding. Especially when the other party has already shown they're ready to leak confidential communications to the press.
     
    Sephiroth Rising 7 likes this.