Don't assume ur fav pastime hobby onto others what u do in ur spare time wit that Oscar pic loomin over u is ur bizzness only, continu on
Here I agree. And I doubt AJ will fight anyone with a pulse, except for Wilder because even though the American will retire him, at least the pension he'll get from that fight will be good.
I disagree, Wilder aint worth ****, never has - he was there just because he was popular american, nothing else. Couldnt even beat Fury 1 time. Disgrace of a fighter. True fake champ.
"Couldn't even beat Fury" like anyone could, haha! Back to the idiotic hating and argumentation - good luck, you've Loudon and FrankinDallas for support.
"VLADD is the only heavyweight champ in history who apparently saved his career best performance for his last fight." Arguably Lewis did that at 37. Prior to the fight he was thinking about at least another three (Vitali, Tyson 2, Wlad), maybe more (Jones). Most champions do not go out on a career best win though, they carry on too long because they're addicted to fighting or to money/status. "he bottled finishing the job that fat andy did instead." True, the Joshua performance has aged poorly. Wlad also bottled the £22 million rematch that was on the table in what would have been his 30th championship fight and 70th overall. It's difficult to comprehend why (he said that he wanted Joshua to go onto great things and he wanted to go out on a "valiant" performance, so much so that he didn't even accept a cash out to fight him again) because he admitted that Joshua was vulnerable and Wlad would have had decent odds of winning a rematch, avenging a loss and going out on a career best win. Or maybe getting himself a trilogy fight, which would also have guaranteed another even bigger payday, been a very winnable fight coming off a victory and added further to his legacy. If he'd lost to Joshua in the rematch then it wouldn't have hurt his legacy much or at all because people would have largely put it down to him being past his best with three losses in a row and immediately rematching a "young lion" who KO'd you, while you're coming off back to back defeats, is in itself laudatory if you try to win, especially at 41+.
He was happy with the date during the final round of discussions. It was Hearn who wasn’t happy with the date. Hearn asked him if he was sure. He asked him if he was sure, because Fury had recently changed the date, which would have given them even less time to prepare. But according to the reports and the interviews that I saw, Joshua told Hearn to try and tie it all up.
Fury fans think shitting on Joshua makes Fury be less pathetic . Fury is still the biggest duck in boxing history .
We obviously have different definitions of the word "disgrace"...mine being the Oxford dictionaries and yours being well, well...made up!
Gutless Joshua finds a way to QUIT or get kod against all three. Dubois knee is the only question mark. these are not Jeremy FRANKFURTER level bums.
He’s always been a disgrace. I wish Wladimir Klitschko knocked him the **** out when he had him hurt really badly because Joshua would’ve never had any success after that, but instead he got lucky and beat an aging legend.
So basically it was Hearn/Joshua's fault it didn't happen but Fury gets the blame for fight Chisora when Joshua didn't want to.
That’s a different debate altogether. You initially said that Joshua had failed to get in the ring with them. That was a laughable comment. As we all know, he’s just fought Usyk twice, before a comeback fight against Franklin. Why/when should he have fought Zhang, Joyce and Dubois? Dubois hasn’t even proven that he’s a world class HW. And he’s already lost to Joyce. Both Joyce and Zhang had done nothing whilst Joshua had been fighting Usyk. Both of them were prospects, who’d had no meaningful victories.