Joshua needs to drag this Wilder negotiation out as long as possible. Wilder will fold.

I know exactly what you clowns were talking about infinite moron. You always come with the "once again read what I wrote" crap. And holding out on Wilder's 50/50 call is what armchairs say on a boxing forum. What you're talking about doesn't even make any ****en sense yet I still indulge you guys pathetic cries. What I provide is intervention to you cry babies who love the fact that Joshua doesn't want to really fight Wilder. You love that **** lol. And why are you asking me how the negotiations would go? #Dafuq

 

If Wilder had wanted the fight right away they would of got it. He wanted 50/50 instead.

So now AJ goes after Parker first as Parkers team really wanted the fight even if they got less.

 

fury beat klitschko in one of the worst title fights of all time. klitschko was already very old and looked like **** his previous fight. aside from klitschko, fury's best win is against an old, shot, powerless cw. who btw almost ko'd him and was ahead on the cards when fury's laying on him wore cunningham out. no one outside the uk rates fury or haye.

 

Fistmas is a stressful time of year to blizzy, cut him some slack

 

No dummy.
You didnt understand what the other poster had written. Obviously pointless me telling you to go back and read it again because even then it wont get through your thick skull.

Forget the rest, as it has gone past you.
I agree we dont know what goes on behind closed doors and have read things with regards to both teams but...
Tell me. If one boxer brings most of the value and can make massive money against any other opponent, and the other boxer who brings less wants 50%. Do you think they will be able to hold out and get 50%?

Cant wait for your next stupid answer

 

Fury beat Klitschko which is a greater win than Joshua, Wilder or Parker have and the fact is nobody else in the previous 10 years had beaten W Klitschko and Wilder as a champ didnt appear from what I saw to be going for that fight.
Aside from Klitschko Fury has as you note beaten Cunningham who was never clearly beaten at HW previously and also has the Hammer win and 2 Chisora wins. It doesnt actually matter what wins Fury does or doesnt have, as he has only had around 25 fights. Very few. Wilder didnt even go near a world title shot until many fights later and even with near 40 fights hasnt even done anywhere near as much.
How can you speak for so many other countries? Or know where someone is or isnt rated? I would guess for all of your comments that Wilder isnt rated overly either. Wilder hasnt any wins as good as Fury or Hayes best HW win and had far far more fights than both.

 

You are correct. He seems to be having a tough time with reality of late

 

Bailey has used logic and truth to crush the deceitful **** gobbling blizzy.

 

why do you think i give a damn about wilder? i am not a blind nationalist. i see fury is already trying to price himself out of a joshua fight.

 

He’s definitely the money fight. I heard on The Boxing Voice that Joshua needs these fighters because they’re the missing piece of the jigsaw, but the reality is that Joshua fights are big, regardless.

So, for me, Joshua is the missing piece of the jigsaw. Should Parker, Wilder, or Fury face each other they would be decent fights in terms of money, but should Joshua fight any of them it suddenly becomes a mega money fight.

If they want paying well, all roads lead to him.

 

Mofo you need to go back and see what I wrote. **** are you talking about mental midget, lmao. His dumbass topic and your dumbass response to what I said shows how ****en ******ed you are. I did a basically translation response and you came with a "no they weren't or no they didn't" response lmao. ****en goon. PS Haye is a ****en bum now. He lost to Bellews bum ass.

 

But what I'm reading on here all the time time is that Joshua is the one who doesn't want to make the fights as he doesn't want to give close to an equal share to a fellow belt-holder.

When a guy sits behind his promoter and let's his promoter price out fighters.. that's just another form of ducking.

I don't care if Joshua is the main draw in the UK.. if he wants Parker or Wilder.. offer them at least a 60/40 split. How about 40-40 with the other 20 going to the winner.

If I'm a champ, and you're a champ... and you want my belt.. come at me 50/50.

 

Also, are a bunch of you guy Eddie Hearn alts? Because I've never seen so much promoter nut-hugging as I've seen with Joshua.

 

That's a very one sided way of looking at it.

Another interpretation is that Joshua's possible opponents are pricing themselves out of the fight by demanding a share of the purse that they don't deserve as they couldn't make anywhere near this much without Joshua, while Joshua can make a guaranteed 8 figures for fighting anyone he likes.

With your logic Takam should have got 60/40 in fact every opponent who faces Joshua from now on should get at least 60/40 regardless of what they bring to the table.