There was no single fighter wlad had to match up against coming off a pathetic and embarrassing loss like the fury loss. The closet was wild man so over rated Sam Peter who got slapped about by a equally heffer in jt. @ 30
gstring was given opportunities to enhance his resume, a bhop beatdown, a ugly fight with lara he could have won, then money guaranteed him a fight after those wins. Its gstring own fault his resume sucks.
Only a complete psychopath would compare the records of a young HW coming off a victory over a legit ATG to a MW champion.
Bit of advice, if you want to really reel people in with your trolling, you need to put more effort in. You're not even trying with this thread.
Yes credit to joshua on getting the "W" as you say. I predicted a WK win as i thought it was too soon for joshua, but when you look at the fight again and actually think about it, Wlad was superb at 41, too much was put on his age and he proved a lot of people wrong, he put up a tremendous fight and nearly got the win himself. This screams re-match. Wlad would be up for it would AJ.
Only way you could talk about GGG and Joshua vs Wlad is if we talk about K2 promotions. Wlad HAD NO BELT, CAME FROM A HUMILIATING DEFEAT , all money was coming from UK fans yet there was no problem to make this fight whatsoever. They fairly split it 50-50 All REFS FROM NEUTRAL COUNTRIES ( only in America people go nuts if they hear about neutral refs ) Change AJ with Canelo and Brits with Mexicans and we have a completely different story. Flat fees , 80-20 all that BS And posters like Nay Sayer blame who....K2 Its the only possible connection one could make between GGG and Joshua vs Wlad I just Tyson'd your lame a×× thread
So all the people reacting negatively... Are you saying beating jacobs (ggg best win)>>>beating wladmir (joshuas best win)?