Joshua vs Bruno...who wins

Joshua won't be seen anywhere near Lennox Lewis in history, if he gets past Pulev I see Fury standing him on his head

 

Bruno was holding on for dear life in the rematch. Thats worse than running. When Bruno stopping holding , Tyson slept him.

 

did I say that.

1-lennox
2- fury
3- aj

 

1-Holmes
2-Tyson
3-Lewis
4-Bowe
5-Holyfield
6-Witherspoon
7-Fury
8-Wlad
9-Vitali
10-Thomas
11-Bruno
12-Tucker
13-Williams
14-Mercer
15-Cooney
16-Smith
17-Ruddock
18-Moorer
19-Tubbs
20-Douglas
21-Dokes

Etc

 

You ok chap?

 

Perfect. Just love spouting truth, that's all

 

.....ok.

 

Oh and Spinks etc, a Foreman 2.0 is better than Josh - think what a 91 Evander would do to Big Josh; he'd have a ****ing field day!

 

I'm sure Frank would've preferred challenging Charles Martin for a title instead of guys like Lennox Lewis and Mike Tyson. A 40-year-old (two-years-on-the-shelf) Wlad would've been easier to beat, too.

Bruno's chin wasn't as bad as people make it out to be. When he got hit with a hard shot, he tended to freeze momentarily moreso than go down. And Joshua's chin isn't very good. When all is said and done, Joshua's chin might be more Bruce Seldon than people care to admit now.

Bruno also had a great jab. Joshua is more athletic and isn't as stiff as a fighter.

It's a pick'em fight, truthfully.

 

thought this was Bruno v aj question?
I don’t even like aj but hate when threads just go off on mad tangents

 

Bruno was in that era.

George said he'd never, ever fight Frank Bruno. 'He had muscles where other people didn't!'

 

george says he wouldn’t fight anyone these days, he’s total complimentary of every fighter

 

This was back when.

 

This. At the moment I’d favor Bruno to stop Joshua, but because Joshua’s still green and his career is still underway, who knows how much he might improve over the years.

 

He's in his 30s. He won't be getting better. He will only slide.