Fury has the best 2 wins, but AJ has the deeper resume for sure AJ has had his clock cleaned as well, so we have to take that into consideration
Honestly, do you not see the millions of discussion's regarding this? Why another thread? You seem to do this a lot , i mean don't take it the wrong way but damn lol
It doesn't matter. Fury beat Wlad first and he beat Wilder. That eclipses the supposed "depth" of Joshua's resume. You could beat 10 Joshua Parker's and it still doesn't eclipse dethrowning wlad
Joshua has Wlad, Parker, Ruiz, Povetkin and Whyte. Fury has Wlad, Wilder and then it drops way off. Chisora? Hammer? Depending on how highly you rate Wilder (not massively in my book) Fury's only advantage over Joshua is his more one-sided win over a fresher Wlad.
Who cares If you don't think Fury takes apart EVERYONE in the division with absolute ease EXCLUDING Usyk (if he can prove he can handle a much bigger man) then you DKSAB. AJ will turn into a no contest after 6 rounds. Same applies to Whyte.
Ima fury fan but he hasnt even run through his own resume with ease. He was nearly tkod by both Wallin and Wilder
Fury wins title then does not defend it, in process losing it, no opportunity for Wlad to try and avenge the loss, Fury claiming mental health issues, abusing illicit substances/alcohol and becoming the Big Mc and KFC chump, no belts from these organisations found big enough to fit Furys waist. Then over 2 and half years later in his comeback fight, has a bout against a natural cruiserweight who is not even best cruiserweight in his family, imagine the abuse AJ would have got for fighting Seferi. I say at present AJs resume is better, at least he kept fighting, time will tell if Fury can continue getting in shape, staying focused and winning, rather than reverting back to post Wlad lifestyle. I truly hope Fury continues on his title holder journey, but time will tell.
You can see it either way, but I say Fury. Their best win is both Klitschko, and Fury's is a mile better. Joshua got him 16 months older and inactive. Fury ended his legendary reign. I honestly think that Joshua has beaten at least three guys better than Wilder, but it is a case of perception being more than reality. Wilder was perceived as one of the big three, and Fury took that on and got it done. Of course, there is the loss. I guess "resume" might mean just the positive, but if you have the DUI on your record, you have to explain it if you want to drive a cab, so that is another big case for Fury. No doubt that Joshua has the depth, and not Larry Holmes depth, but depth fighting the best he could get in the ring. Two thoroughbreds.
I look at AJ's resume and I believe Fury beats all those opponents, maybe not in the same style but he beats them all. I look at Fury's and I'm not sure AJ beats Wilder. And I'm not sure AJ would have beaten Klitschko in Germany when Klitschko was a couple of years younger. So those Fury wins are impressive, although Fury lacks depth in terms of resume the big wins are big.
