Joshua vs Povetkin is an absolute mismatch and was well calculated by Eddie Hearn!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by f1ght3rz, Jul 3, 2018.


  1. Angler Andrew

    Angler Andrew Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,263
    10,267
    Jun 28, 2016
    It is funny how at HW size doesn’t get mentioned the same,you can’t even put it into context how many pounds AJ has on Povetkin,who can forget how ordinary and bereft of ideas Povetkin was against Wlad.
     
    Mr Icaman and Luis Fernando like this.
  2. Angler Andrew

    Angler Andrew Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,263
    10,267
    Jun 28, 2016
    I know many disagreed with your thread about super heavyweights against those at 6”3 say,I was one who was in agreement as you did give a small percent chance of the smaller guy winning but in reality it’s like 80/20.
     
    Luis Fernando likes this.
  3. Luis Fernando

    Luis Fernando Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,120
    1,275
    Aug 23, 2017
    You're making wild assumptions. I don't hate Povetkin! Not sure how you arrived at that conclusion.

    And that's not Povetkin in my profile picture. Take a closer look and you'll find that it's not Povetkin.

    I'm just stating facts here. On the contrary, I'm a huge fan of Povetkin. But, I'm not a fan of him being a heavyweight. He would be my favorite fighter (due to his style), if he fought at cruiser weight or even light heavyweight. But he has no business fighting at heavyweight and putting his health at huge risk against giant behemoths.

    Can you honestly say that Povetkin and Joshua even belong in the same ring together after looking at the pictures I posted? It's insane and preposterous that people even consider such fights as legitimate fights when in actual fact, they are disgusting, pathetic and repulsive mismatches against the much smaller guy.

    But most of those same people spend most of their time arguing about how PEDs create unfair uneven playing fields. Yet, this size mismatch is just as much, if not even more unfair and dangerous.
     
  4. Angler Andrew

    Angler Andrew Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,263
    10,267
    Jun 28, 2016
    Outside of HW it’s like Amir Khan facing Kovalev
     
  5. Tigers Only

    Tigers Only Member banned Full Member

    120
    76
    Jun 29, 2018
    Threadstarter is an absolute troll!
     
  6. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,428
    241,048
    Nov 23, 2013
    Sorry, I'm not nearly as impressed by muscle men as you are. Danny and McBride didn't expose a goddamn thing you crackpot, Tyson was a 20 year pro partially retired shell of what he once was, 2 and 3 years removed from the beatdown at the hands of Lennox Lewis, against whom he was a past prime shell. AJ wouldn't make it out of the 2nd round against a prime Tyson.
     
  7. Kingmaffe

    Kingmaffe Active Member Full Member

    517
    576
    Jul 22, 2017
    I really don’t know if you’re trolling or just not very bright. You wrote the same drivel when Povetkin fought Price, and we all know how that went. I surely wasnt fearing for the health of Povetkin, when Price was laying cold on the floor. Same thing when Povetkin was beating Wach from pilar to post.

    Size DOES make a difference of course, but you make it sound like size=win, which is very far from the truth.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  8. SmackDaBum

    SmackDaBum TKO7 banned Full Member

    5,191
    1,715
    Nov 22, 2014
    Price>Crawford.

    There are weight classes for a reason. 50 years ago when Ali was the best of the 200+ pounders the average weight of the Rings top 10 heavyweights was 203.8(!) lbs that year... You didn't need to separate them with another weight class back then because even the biggest of them barely outsized their competition anyway...

    Here are their average weights and weights from their fights of 1968:

    203.66 (Frazier: 203+203.5+204.5)
    197.5 (Ellis: 198+197)
    205.25 (Bomevana: 207+206+205+206+204+203.5)
    207.17 (Chuvalo: 208+208.5+207+210.5+197+212)
    220.39 (Liston: 215.75+219+223+221+219+222+223)
    198.75 (Quarry: 203+204+195+193)
    194.4 Martin: 200+199+199+195+194
    205.7 (Ramos: 210+196+208+208.5+206)
    216.67 (Lewis: 215+212+215+218+219+22)
    188.5 (Patterson: 188.5)

    Average: 203.8

    The only outlier (Liston) outsize his average competition with a little bit more than 16 pounds...

    You simply didn't have to add another superheavyweight division back then.
     
  9. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    No doubt size matters to a certain degree in boxing hence the need for weight classes but it's not the be all and end all in regards to performance and results. Hence why you have smaller guys going up in weights and having success and there being examples of plenty of smaller fighters like Tyson, Frazier, Marciano etc being on the small side yet beating bigger men regularly.

    Povetkin fits this mould he's small for a modern heavyweight but fact is all but 8 of his 35 opponents have been bigger than him, yet he has beaten all but one of them. Which means he has a 96% success rate against fighters bigger than him.

    So it's pretty clear being bigger than Povetkin alone doesn't guarantee victory, far from it in fact.
     
  10. Kingmaffe

    Kingmaffe Active Member Full Member

    517
    576
    Jul 22, 2017
    Define your definition of “bigger”. Are we talking height, weight or a combination. Because the “small” heavyweights are also much heavier today. Povetkin is hovering around 230, Parker is in the 240’s, Takam who is shredded weighs over 230 consistently etc.

    Those three are some of the top “small” heavyweights, and they all weigh more than “Big Bear” Liston or “Big” George Foreman even. The heavyweights are bigger today, thats just how it is.
     
  11. f1ght3rz

    f1ght3rz Ronaldoooo is crying in his caaaaaar Full Member

    17,693
    21,284
    Jan 31, 2018
    Who are you to call me troll? STFU.
     
  12. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,309
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    It's easy why some might think you are a troll. You rag on a 38 year old, past prime, PED free Povetkin as a poor opponent for Joshua then have a 38 year old, past prime, PED free boxer as your avatar pic.
     
  13. f1ght3rz

    f1ght3rz Ronaldoooo is crying in his caaaaaar Full Member

    17,693
    21,284
    Jan 31, 2018
    No to your last question. And i tell you why: I expected a tough job for Wilder because Ortiz is a heavy handed southpaw with world class counterpunching skills and genious ring iq. He did well and nearly took Wilder out, probably 10-15 seconds away from that. It was a tough fight like expected. Povetkin won't give the same kind of fight to Joshua.

    It's relatively easy to explain.

    Ortiz doesn't need the body of a 30-32 old guy to fight on a high level. His whole game plan is based on other things like counterpunching skills, a genious ring iq and smart (not fast) moving. Rewatch the Wilder fight and tell me Ortiz slow movement or declining body was a factor. NO. It was not. Ortiz doesn't need to be 32 or 33 to fight on that level. Imo he looked better vs Wilder than vs Jennings, he only faced a far more dangerous opponent so he was a bit more careful instead of going all in like he did vs Jennings.

    And your list is a joke, isn't it? Ortiz didn't look good trash talk...lmao

    Ortiz looked great vs the guy AJ is ducking right now and nearly took him out.
    Ortiz took Martz out in the second round without having a proper training camp before + a KD in the first round
    Ortiz stopped Dave Allen for the first time without having a proper training camp
    Ortiz won 12/12 rounds vs Scott and knocked him down three times while Scott was running away for 12 rounds

    Povetkin simply lost it. He is a very good boxer and 4-5 years ago he would have put up a real threat to AJ but no way it will be a close fight. We can talk later, the fight is ~two months away so we have to wait but let's see then, i won't blame anyone who is thinking the opposite but you all will see that AJ vs Povetkin is a total mismatch and AJ will probably not lose a single round there.
     
  14. f1ght3rz

    f1ght3rz Ronaldoooo is crying in his caaaaaar Full Member

    17,693
    21,284
    Jan 31, 2018
    I explain my point of view so this TROLL trash talk is some kind of AJ fanboy stuff i can't take that seriously. Even if the guy isn't explaining WHY it's not like i wrote.

    You all will come back to this topic after the fight and will think "okaaaay, he might has had a point there that was a bit true...."

    I didn't troll on Joshua or Povetkin. I like both but it won't change the mismatch factor here and the also the factor Povetkin is one of those guys who lost it during the years after getting older and older AND being off the juice.
     
  15. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    I like Povetkin, should be a good fight while it lasts although AJ is the massive favorite. First half of the fight will hopefully be somewhat competitive.