Is AJ’s resume really any better than Wilder’s? AJ’s best win is 41year old shot Wlad , so how come most brits see Joshua as someone who is so great and call Wilder a can crusher ? Take Wlad off his record and Wilder has better resume. If you don’t give kevin McBride much credit for beating 39yo Tyson, you should not overrate AJ’s win over 41yo Wlad.
Joshua is 20-0, Wilder is 40-0, been champion for years. AJ has the better resume, in terms of averages. But he took on Ortiz, signed to fight Povetkin so I don't get on his back for his resume anymore as it appears he is trying to fix it
Lol neither one has fought anybody. Wilder best win came against a over weight 40 year old Ortiz. AJ as you said best win was against a 41 year old shot Wlad. Both are a joke but Wilder has fought better opponents than AJ has. Which isn't really saying much since AJ has fought absolutely nobody.
Ok, if you deleted Wlad from AJ's resume, because of his age, then you should do the same with Ortiz, Wlad with AJ, was at least no worse than Ortiz. And without Wlad, AJ has good scalps in his resume Breazeale,Whyte,Takam,
Wilder has 2 top 10 guys on his resume, one of which was utter garbage. That's in 40 fights. That pretty much says all you need to know. Outside die hard Wilder sack swingers, no rational boxing fan would even waste time to compare their respective resumes.
Bermane Stiverne is better than Takam/Whyte/ or Breazeale. Bermane went the 12 with Wilder their first fight but then turned around and didn't fight for 2 years and came into their second fight out of shape. Bermane is also old. Well he was 37 in their first fight and had a little juice left. He has no juice left now. Bermane could also punch pretty hard.
Lol and who did AJ fight? Only dimwit Brits or morons who just hate Wilder because it is the cool thing to do would say AJ fought better opponents than he has. Wilder has fought nothing but trash and AJ has fought even worse trash.
I stopped listening to Joshua’s fanatics a long time ago. They’re helping Joshua milk the titles on message boards now, lmao.
Even if you take of Wlad, Joshua has beat more top ten heavyweight. Joshua, Takam, Breazeale, Whyte. Wilder, Ortiz and Stiverne. But you have to include Wlad who would easyily embarrass and stop Wilder and make it look easy.
How do you know he would have easily embarrassed Wilder? Just because Joshua went life and death with shot Wlad and you want to make that win so great for AJ, does not mean Wlad would have walked through Wilder. I’m not sure how good is whyte , or Breazyale , are they really any better then liakhovich , szpilka , Arreola? I think wilder would have mauled Takam, while joshua needed a british stoppage to finish takam.
Do you watch them both fight. Wladimir has defence and offensive skills and fantastic footwork. Wilder is completely useless apart from that one punch. Very easy fight for Wladimir.