Juan Lazcano V Timothy Bradley

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Fat Joe, May 4, 2008.


  1. Fat Joe

    Fat Joe Let's have it right Full Member

    6,255
    0
    Feb 12, 2008
    Hatton's and Witter's next opponents.

    There's a lot of banter in the Brit Forum about what kind of quality opponent they are.

    No one seems to know much about Bradley in the Brit Forum.

    I'm not familiar with either fighter. Do any of you American's have an opinion on who is the better fighter?
     
  2. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    Lazcarno on points in a decent scrap.
     
  3. warrior85

    warrior85 R.I.P THUNDER Full Member

    11,865
    3
    May 30, 2007
    never seen bradley fight,never heard of him until he was matched up with castillo,so i cant say.
     
  4. Antwuan Maxx

    Antwuan Maxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,248
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    Lazcano is close to being a shot fighter. Not only did he lose to Vivian Harris, but his previous fight with Manuel Garnica should have been a loss to. While Bradley on the other hand, had no trouble what so ever with Garnica, and put him down twice. Prime for prime, Lazcano beats Bradley. Currently, Bradley UDs him.
     
  5. Mikey

    Mikey I'm An Uzi Lover Full Member

    1,148
    0
    Jan 3, 2008
    Bradley by wide UD
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Exactly in the 1 common opponent recently Bradley proved to be allot better

    What do you make of Bradley?
     
  7. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    Wasn't Hatton better than Mayweather in terms of common opponents?

    It means nothing.

    Lazcano has achievements in boxing, has fought against big names and has proven himself as a good boxer.

    Bradley has fought nobody and an unbeaten american with no hype must be pretty poor.
     
  8. Mikey

    Mikey I'm An Uzi Lover Full Member

    1,148
    0
    Jan 3, 2008
    Lazcano 15 year career no world titles. A decade to get a title shot.

    Takes Bradley 3 years to get a title shot and be rated number 1 in the world rankings.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Bradley won every round against Garnica and dropped him. Garnica beat Lazcanno (got robbed) and beat Viscous Maussa.

    Stop nutthugging Hatton, Lazcanno is done, coming off 2 defeats, hasnt fought in a year and is 33. Just take this fight for what it is, a gimme
     
  10. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    It took Leon Spinks 1 year to become the undisputed heavyweight world champion.

    Sonny Liston was a pro for 9 years before getting his shot.

    Therefore, according to this logic, Spinks > Liston. Get the **** out of here, with that stupid logic.

    I picked Lazcano. Unlike Bradley he's beaten good opponents and has been ranked very highly. Bradley is a nothing fighter. I can't even imagnie how much **** would be kcked up if Hatton decided to fight Bradley instead of Lazcano.
     
  11. Antwuan Maxx

    Antwuan Maxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,248
    2
    Apr 23, 2006
    Have you even seen Lazcano's recent bouts? Particularly the Harris and Garnica fights? Doesn't sound like it. He looked like **** in both of those fights and clearly lost. He also had a war with Ben Tackie, in which he actually came close to putting Tackie away, but took just as much as he dished out. Those victories you refer to were how many years ago?
     
  12. Mikey

    Mikey I'm An Uzi Lover Full Member

    1,148
    0
    Jan 3, 2008
    #

    You picked Lazcano cause your totally ****ing deluded, get a clue. He carried his lightweight ranking, ranked nowhere by all sanctioning bodies bar the IBO. Plus my logic stands, how many world titles did Liston fight for? How many did Lazcano fight for?