Or would this guy have one of the most complete resumes today if all of his close decisions had gone his way? Two wins over Pacquiao, a undisputed win over MAB... Win over the number one, undefeated featherweight in the world in Chris John. So, really, he'd have one legit loss, against Norwood, in 15 years of fighting. Hmm?
Stop dreaming boi coz he is not PAC owns him twice and resume is lack of big fights other than PAC & Barrera :rofl :rofl :rofl
IMO, he only has 1 loss to Norwood, thus the problem with these incompetent judges. Fight vs. John was a bad robbery though, a shame.
yeah, his resume could be very good. but even with a loss and a draw with pac, it was still his two greatest fights and be remembered by people because of them.
Marquez dosen't have the Power to KO or seriously hurt his opponents, so he has to settle for what the judges give him:wtf he fought Paq and lost both fights for a reason he couldn't hurt Paq but Manny put JMM on his back 4 times... Also judges are sometimes swayed by popular figures and starpower, and JMM is about as MARKETABLE AS A TURD..:verysad
Oh Divac has company here! JMM never really lost, Either JMM wins or the judge is corrupt or incompetent!!! atsch Wake up boy! Everytime you don't like the result, the judge is corrupt or incompetent!
yes, barrera back at that time was more of a brawler in his prime..i think he'll do better than his 1st fight with pac.
Oh please just shut up *******. Marquez beat both Chris John and Pacquiao. Only the pac nuthuggers will say otherwise. :yep
wrong. the decison against John was fair. and he got lucky to pull out a draw in the first fight against Pacquiao, where one of the judges forgot to deduct him a point when he should have. And Barrera was shot when JMM beat him, yet he still had a hard time. JMM is a great fighter, but he fell short a few times too many
I'd reccomend you learnt proper English and to actually read what the **** I wrote, but you just showned yourself to be a ******, so... :tired:rofl