Juan Manuel Marquez rejects Joe Cortez for his Pac rematch!

so divac.. do chris john ring a bell??

 

I'm through. I already sited this same argument to him before. The damn commissioner even says there is no basis for protest because it's discretionary. Can you imagine if judges could go back after a fight, no matter how far after and say they scored a round wrong? How many fights could be altered due to any number of reasons.....in ANY Sport. Hell, they won't give Jones a Gold Medal, and one the judges ADMITTED it was fixed.

 

You used it after I did, so you used something after I already did so, and thus used it back on me, so it is learning. Deny it all you want but its a fact

And it wasnt a discretionary error since he felt he was following the rule system, which of course he wasnt.

 

In my research BTW, I have seen more journalists score it a Draw or win for Pacquiao than for Marquez. Just laying out the facts. It's 4-1-1 right now.

 

please you're the same clown who said HBO scored it for Marquez

you're just a racial **** who thinks all pinoys are the same

 

That was pitiful. No mention on how my facts were wrong after I quoted an article for you right? I think perhaps you learned something, not the other way around.

By the way, your logic is only correct if I have never used the word correction before in the same manner as you did earlier in this thread. I assure you I have. But if that little bit of baiting is what makes you feel all tingly, enjoy.

 

Exactly!

Unless there was an error in adding up the scores, you cant go back and erase what was a 10-7 round and change it to a 10-6....its just that simple!:thumbsup

 

we're not arguing if the outcome had a right to be protested, we're talking about what would happen if the WBC was involved here.

and by changing outcomes from the ones i mentioned all the way to almost recognizing Mikey Tyson should of won against Douglas because Douglas was given a long count. I dont see why is it that hard not to believe why they wouldnt do it in a situation like this.

 

divac is a moron.

he's even a chicken. :rofl :rofl

he's still in lala land that 3 ko is 10-7 and hugging jmm's ball whose claim for fame is a injured pac after the first round :yep :yep :yep

ask him to make a bet then he'll turn into a chicken :deal

 

tu che'

you got me on the facts ill admit fault there

but i still got you on the learning part, spin it all you want, thats my small victory in this debate :hey

 

ALMOST recognizing Tyson. They didn't did they? You know why? There is no set way a ref is supposed to count. All refs have a different count. Too discretionary.

The two events you mentioned had no discretion involved.

 

What exactly did I learn from you? The word "correction"? Is this your stance?

 

Neither does not knowing if a 10-6 round can be scored.

and the reason why they didnt allow Tyson the victory because the WBA and IBF threaten to not recognize the WBC a legitimate title if they did so...nothing about being to discretionary.

 

Who said HBO scored it for JMM! I sure did'nt.......I did say that Emmanuel Steward did'nt give a score, but alluded to JMM winning in his mind.

.....and no need to get nasty just because an argument does'nt side your way!:smooch

 

I used it and you used it against me and stop making it a big deal out of it.