Juan Manuel Marquez rejects Joe Cortez for his Pac rematch!

How do you know he didn't know? Scoring is discretionary, that's a fact.

Why the hell would the WBC care if the IBF and WBA didn't recognize them? Especially the NEW IBF at the time?

Link please.

 

Says the guy who ACTUALLY brought it up. You have no idea what you're saying lol, and it's quite funny. Please, continue with your "moral" victory

 

not knowing the rules and Discretionary are 2 completely things

and here you go

http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:4072

After the fight, Tyson's promoter,

This content is protected

, attempted to have the result voided, claiming that the referee had given Douglas a "long count" when he was down in the 8th. He claimed that video replays showed Douglas was down for more than 10 seconds. The

This content is protected

initially appeared to be willing to agree with King, but later changed their mind after the

This content is protected

and

This content is protected

announced that they would recognize Douglas as the undisputed champion. It was later learned that several of the top U.S. boxing commissions and the British Boxing Board has threatened to withdraw from the WBC if they failed to recognize Douglas's victory.

 

EXACTLY!!!

:rofl

Lrn2useUrownphrases

 

Seems kinda bogus to me. The WBC should have done what it felt like doing.

Scoring is discretionary. And no one knows if he really knew the rules or not. Only what he said after the fact, which is the entire point and reason why they can't change it.

BTW, since we are playing little games. I would like to point out to you that the 2 instances you are using in which the WBC changed a ruling on a fight, they changed it in favor of the MEXICAN fighter...right? And where was the WBC created and who is it run by? MEXICO. So how do you know they would have altered the fight against the Mexican fighter involved? If we are playing this little what if game......

Fact of the matter is, none of it is relevant.

 

at you thinking that you have the patent on the word "correction"

 

You are so friggn lucky everything or 1 year on this site has been erased. You went off to say HBO had Marquez winning just because Kellerman said he thought JMM won.

and please when you do get the time look up every recognizable boxing journalist scorecard and post them up here.

 

So now your arguement is that the WBC is biased in favor of Mexican fighters?

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl at you for taking this **** seriously

 

Nope, I pointed out some simple facts. And then I asked you a question.

I don't believe the WBC has any bias that's any different than any other bias that other orgs have. You are the one who believes that the WBC would suddenly do something here that others wouldn't based on their past actions. I simply pointed out the full scope of those actions.

 

For you thinking I do. No one knows what I take seriously lol, and I like it that way.

 

A great majority of journalist throught the net had JMM over MAB, but the way you here it now in forums like these, they'd say that journalist were split on that issue.
A year from now, you'll have people on this forum saying that MAB was outright robbed vs JMM! :nut

 

The WBC has a history of changing results similiar to this fight which is why Im assuming they would if they were involved.
You are assuming they wouldnt because it breaks their own rules and that it is a discretionary error(which i disagree about it being dicretionary).

we arent going to find any middle ground here, so just leave it be its a sorry debate about coulda and woulda.

Kind of Ironic that the upcoming rematch is for the WBC title alone.

 

WTF does MAB/JMM scorecards have to do with Pac/JMM scorecards

 

Well considering that you are responding and trying to get the last word of it everytime, its hard to believe you arent taking it seriously.