Juan Manuel Marquez vs Chris John

You'd fight for free? Then you must be a ****ing ******. Having said that though, I don't suppose you have too many brain cells to risk.

 

Thats alot in pesos! But anyways he probably wanted John's belt more than the money. In Indonesia bad decision.

 

Tbh I usually went with the flow of "marquez was robbed" like people always say for all his fights but when I watched this fight and scored it, I had it really close (I think an edge to john) but the fight was really slow paced

 

WTF?! This fight does not matter anymore! JMM is now a big name. You can't say the same thing to Chris John so I believe barely fought overseas! Hmm similar to British champ who only fought in the later part of his career.

 

Only when he's fighting Pacquiao.

 

he knew he would be beaten to pulp

 

By the judges. :good

 

JMM never appreciated ... or maybe his style if wrong against someone who is more active than him?

 

Moron atsch

 

Seems like the judges always favor someone who is more active than him. Even if the better work is done by him.

 

Fixed it for you, you're welcome.

 

:good

 

Stinky just figured out why the judges felt Bradley beat Pac.:yep

 

yeah, that and maybe judges see different things compare to watching it on tv. I mean if you are always getting the wrong end of a decision. You can conclude that you are doing something wrong for the judges. Its not just bad luck anymore if you are always getting screwed so perhaps we could say its his own fault too for not changing up his style early in his career.