Juan Manuel MARQUEZ vs. Nate CAMPBELL - The fight for the Undisputed LW Championship

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Sep 14, 2008.


  1. Jose Rizal

    Jose Rizal Member Full Member

    412
    0
    Sep 13, 2005
    **** Sulaiman. Casa lost to Sta. Cruz and didn't deserve that title anyway. That makes his lineal tag suspect. :tired

    :D
     
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    True but nonetheless he was lineal champ
     
  3. Jose Rizal

    Jose Rizal Member Full Member

    412
    0
    Sep 13, 2005
    I don't see him much lineal of anything after the Sta. Cruz and Katsidis fights. :D If that passes by your standards, then that's ok and I'll leave it at that.
     
  4. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    He lost with Santa Cruz but technically he won so he still was lineal,he looked decent with Katsidis,I actually thought Katsidis will KO
     
  5. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,331
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    Campbell By KO. !!!!!
     
  6. Jose Rizal

    Jose Rizal Member Full Member

    412
    0
    Sep 13, 2005
    OK! So you admit he lost but I agree that he's a champ on a technicality (stupid judging). That's why he's being given a 2nd chance to prove he really deserves to be Champ via a rematch which he refused so he was justly stripped. Then there goes his claim as lineal champ.
     
  7. GOTTIcsc

    GOTTIcsc Glasgow Celtic FC Full Member

    379
    0
    Jul 21, 2007
    Pacman is a paper champ


    Get real for **** sake
     
  8. Jose Rizal

    Jose Rizal Member Full Member

    412
    0
    Sep 13, 2005
    I am keeping it real. That's why so is JMM... a paper champ.
     
  9. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Santa Cruz ain't no lineal chanmp himself,reall Casa was lineal and now JMM is
     
  10. shadow boxer

    shadow boxer Member Full Member

    322
    0
    Aug 26, 2008
    Fingers crossed this fight gets made for early 2009. Shouldnt be too much of a problem considering their personalities. Nate is the kind of guy who wont back down from anyone and JMM has a great chance to build a real legacy. JMM to beat Nate in a closely fought battle, probably a wide UD.
     
  11. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    I think GBP's plan is now making the JMM-Juan Diaz fight but it is not the best option. Casamayor should fight Diaz on the undercard of JMM-Campbell! :good
     
  12. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    It be a close fight.. I could see either winning.. I'd probably lean towards JMM a little, but I think Nate can rough him up..

    I think this fight just might take place with Pac fighting DLH.. To be honest, I'm more interested in a JMM/Juan Diaz fight..
     
  13. wushu

    wushu Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,713
    0
    Jun 25, 2008
    Exactly!
     
  14. onepunch.net

    onepunch.net Active Member Full Member

    1,314
    0
    Mar 7, 2007
    Actually thats not true. Both Corrales and Casamayor had agreed that the winner would do the mandatory defense against David diaz next. After winning, Casamayor told the WBC that he would NOT fight Diaz, because there was no money in it, and instead pursued a fight with Freitas. Casamayor was rightfully stripped for refusing to fight his mandatory defense. And as full of **** as I think Suiliman is, he was dead right in that case. Refuse your mandatory, and you get stripped. Simple as that.