Judah lost to tough or slick boxers, Khan is neither

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by vengeex, Jul 17, 2011.


  1. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Depends on the definition of tough and slick, Khan can be considered both.
     
  2. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005

    kahn is a good boxer and he's got some toughness to him. prolly more toughness then judah i think, im rooting for judah but im picking kahn to win a ud
    hope im wrong though.
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    judah is such the great puncher and finisher these days he has all of 3 ko wins in 6 1/2 years :deal

    2006 NO KOs
    2007 NO KOs
    2008 NO KOs
    2009 Ubaldo Hernandez TKO2 (Hernandez has 19 losses)
    2010 Jose Armando Santa Cruz tko3 (unranked and 3rd loss in 6 fights)
    2011 Kaizer Mabuza TKO7 (judah hands Mabuza loss # 7)

    judah isnt finishing anyone early in this fight....
     
  4. ElTrigueno

    ElTrigueno Guest



    How many "quality" opponents does Khan have since you want to compare resumes?

    El Chino Maidana and who else? Remember Zab was the man back in 01 or 02 when he took on Tzsyu and we saw what happened when the young guy came in and thought he was untouchable.
     
  5. Peppermint

    Peppermint Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,014
    18
    Sep 7, 2010
    I dont think Kahn is very skilled at all comoared to the elite fighters in the sport, he is more physically gifted than most though with the exception of his chin, Judah will exploit his technical flaws win or lose.
     
  6. vengeex

    vengeex Boxing Junkie banned

    10,060
    0
    Mar 22, 2011
    It's already defined in the first post of this thread.

    Slick = Mayweather, Spinks
     
  7. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Define tough. Because I would consider it tough getting knocked the **** out by Prescott and still getting up wanting to continue, also pretty tough taking huge shots from Maidana and staying vertical.
     
  8. vengeex

    vengeex Boxing Junkie banned

    10,060
    0
    Mar 22, 2011
    It's already defined in the first post of this thread.

    Tough - Clottey, Cotto, Baldomir, Tszyu

    Someone who's very hard to crack.
     
  9. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,075
    3,664
    Jun 30, 2005
    Khan is neither, but Zab isn't the same fighter he once was. Not that he was ever great, but he's slowed down in recent years and hasn't looked too good even in his wins.

    I'm not counting Zab out, Khan is extremely flawed, but I still think Amir outworks Zab and wins a UD.

    I consider it a 65/35 fight.
     
  10. SonOfCuba

    SonOfCuba Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,808
    0
    Mar 5, 2010
    you dummy.
     
  11. vengeex

    vengeex Boxing Junkie banned

    10,060
    0
    Mar 22, 2011
    What's up 'diot?
     
  12. vengeex

    vengeex Boxing Junkie banned

    10,060
    0
    Mar 22, 2011
    Amir's high workrate and speed will win him rounds. What I'm worried if he gets tagged with something big. Zab might finish him off if that happens. Khan is a bit vulnerable.
     
  13. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    13,207
    11
    Nov 23, 2010
    Maidana is tough but not too skilled, a decent enough finisher could have had Khan out of there.

    Judah is skilled but not tough, so after 4 or so rounds of coping with Khans speed and workrate, mentally he will start to erode.
     
  14. aka TORA

    aka TORA Full Member

    1,935
    0
    Nov 23, 2010
    thats not a definition
    its just a commonly used saying that means **** all
     
  15. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    13,207
    11
    Nov 23, 2010
    Slick - defensively adept, will usually fight with low hands, good at counter-punching, excellent reflexes, someone who can land but not get hit, and of course brilliant technically, and very accurate.