chavez jr vs carlos molina, roth had it draw, ford had jr. winning by 2 these 2 judges work for arum. this is proof right here
That doesn't stop it from him being in on the robbery. By making it close but giving it to Pacquiao... morons would say... "See... even the guy who gave it to Pacquiao had it a close fight... the other two scores weren't far off."
LOL you had Lopez beating Pavlik?!? Pot. . Kettle. . Black. . . LOL Adelaide Byrd had the fight a draw, and she's a known racist. Seriously, Pavlik CLEARY won that fight by a pretty good margin. Lopez won 3 rounds on my card, and that's definitely all he won.
and said........ "I'm looking for effective aggressiveness," Roth said. "I thought Pacquiao won a lot of the early rounds, and I thought Bradley came on in the end. That's why I gave Bradley the last three rounds. But I still thought Pacquiao had done enough to win." I think Duane Ford is the guy who should be in question here.......... "I thought Bradley gave Pacquiao a boxing lesson," Duane Ford said, according to the newspaper. "I thought a lot of the rounds were close. Pacquiao missed a lot of punches and I thought he was throwing wildly."
You are missing the point. He is a judge in another controversial decision. He himself had the fight close...which is controversial in itself... and lends more credibility to the other scorecards which had it for Bradley. They did the same thing in Pac vs Marquez II.... Roth had it for Marquez close... Ford and the other judge had it for Pac. Marquez clearly won that fight. It happens over and over again. Being part of a bogus decision isn't only the work of the judges who scored it incorrectly. By scoring the fight close, he made the other judges scorecards look more credible. Wrap your brain around it for a minute.
yes, he did. the only one who had it right. he gave chavez jr. a draw vs. molina. a fight many thought molina won. if u remember, jr. is arums boy :hey