Judge Roth: “How anybody could see that fight so one-sided is beyond me

Roth is spot on, was a 7-5 fight in Pacs favour.

Round 1 and 9-12 was Bradley.

 

Workrate is landing more punches. Missed or block punches are not supposed to be scored. Landing more shots, and even more importantly, doing more damage than the other guy is what wins rounds. Bradley didn't do either of those aside from 3 MAYBE 4 rounds.

 

your ****ing blind man, Manny missed most of his shots even in the fourth when it looked when HBO told you that Bradley was hurt watch Mannys flurry in that round 99% of those shots were blocked or slipped Manny landed one shot in that series and I am sorry but just cus you get some ******ed Filipinos excited and their vaginal secretions flowing that doesnt mean you won the round

Rounds are scored on the entire 3 min period

 

Right and if u do in 20 seconds more than your opponent u win the round.
That is the essence of Boxing.
If your losing 11 rounds and u land one punch and KO ur opponent u win
Losing 2:55 of a round and scoring even a flash knockdown makes it impossible to lose the round.
Manny hunted down Bradley and landed hard shots and stole rounds.
Otherwise if a fighter was winning 1:36 of a round the judges could get up and go to the bathroom

 

The vast majority would say you are the one who is blind. Both guys missed a lot of shots actually. Both were very defensive/counter minded for a good period of each round. Manny however did land more punches in most of the rounds. And his punches ALWAYS had far more effect than Bradleys. Honestly... This was an easy one sided fight to score. But then bias fans are bias and this is ESB.

 

Bazooka is forgetting that in those minutes that Bradley was active, he wasn't being effective. Sure he was punching a lot but he was hitting Manny's arms. Even Manny said this. Pac on the other hand wasn't busy as much but when he punched he landed cleanly thus winning the rounds. The fight is scored based on effective punching. DO you know how to score a fight?

 

I had Manny winning 8-4.

 

What if Pacquiao missed shots, he still landed clean shots. Fights are won on punches landed, not punches thrown. It's like with Floyd, there are fights where his opponent throws a lot more punches, but nothing lands, and even if Floyd's punches are lesser, he connects more..

 

You have a point to make and you can try and rationalize whatever you'd like.

If you can't see what's being said here by Jerry Roth then clearly it is YOU who is incapable of complex thought.

Despite whatever this man says, he's the only person that DID score it for Pacquiao. Even this critic of his lack of killer instinct and didn't do enough yada yada yada had deemed Pacquiao the winner.

I'd like to hear what in the **** was wrong with CJ Ross and Duane Ford.

 

Most of those were blocked or kidney shots, which are illegal and henceforth not counted.

They're useful in a fight because it's supposed to damage your opponent but when you punch like Tim, well... They just look fancy.

Not to mention Ortiz and just about half of his other opponents did that **** to Mayweather and virutally no one counts that as valid punches.

 

A very simple concept that defendants here are not grasping. Why? I have no ****ing idea.

 

The fact that the fight started past their bedtime already.

 

True true.

Pacman appears not bothered by those kidney shot.

 

I can understand how people have it for Bradley. I watched it with the sound off (for no particular reason other than that I was watching it at work) and thought rounds 1,2,6,8,10,11,12 were rounds that could possibly be given to Bradley. I didn't give him those rounds, I had it 5-4-1 for Pac, but I understand how they could have gone the other way. This was a close, competitive fight, and for many of the rounds Pac didn't do much of anything while Timmy was jabbing at his face and making a spirited attempt.

 

Bazooka mentioned a very important part of this fight, especially in the last 6 rounds. Pac missed A LOT. It wasn't exactly how good Bradley was doing, but he was making Pac look terrible. In the second half of the fight, he barely hit Bradley..and that's what the judges picked up on.

With that said, I don't think Bradley won. I had it 6-6 giving Bradley the 1st and I'm not sure he deserved it. Roth's card and thoughts are near perfect. Anybody who didnt give Bradley 4 rounds stopped watching, or were infuenced by the awful commentaing by Lampley, Lederman and crew.