Judge Roth: “How anybody could see that fight so one-sided is beyond me

I had it 115-113 Pacquiao, Pac also dominated five of the seven rounds which he won in my opinion, I could see how someone had Bradley winning only because boxing is scored round by round, if it was scored as a whole Pac won by a wide margin.

 

If a person who is "boxing" and total number of jabs and body blows in the round is 10 and the other person lands 15, the latter person wins the round, assuming each blow is equal.

Someone boxes well and stays doesn't get hit for 2 minutes, doesn't matter, if at the end of the round, he's still be hit more than he hit.

 

I think Bradley did NOT do enough to beat the champ. In the old days, you had to BEAT that ass to get the champs jewelry. Now... You just gotta flee and tap for 12 rounds. It helps if you pretend you fought 10 rounds with a broken leg. You get Rocky Balboa sympathy votes for that kinda shet. For the record, I dislike Manny.. I think he is a 3 gallon head havin, Steroid Tic Tac chewin, lil shady mutha****a. He has those sneaky eyes.

 

Of course it's beyond you, you thought Rios beat Abril

 

Boy you are one dumb son of a *****. Lets see in his most active round Manny's connect percentage dropped from over 40% to 35% and yes that is Mayweatheresque.

Here is Mayweather-Cotto show me the round where floyd landed 35% or better of his punches.

http://compuboxonline.com/compubox-stats-mayweather-w-12-cotto/

Now what proves that you really don't know **** about boxing is that you are arguing that in his most active round his connect percentage dropped a little.

Well not **** Sherlock. Any other aspects of wisdom you want to share with us like the sun comes up every morning. Or that fire is hot. Or some other idiotic and moronic observation.

 

I can see Bradley getting 3 to 5 rds.

I do think Timmy beasts him convincenly if they ever rematch though.

 

:yep

 

I didnt make one argument you said I did, like I literally never said any of those things...if you're functionally ******ed or something, I apologize I don't like to pick on special needs people.

 

The straight left looked to land better than the Jab to be honest. But I'll throw Tim a bone.....:smoke

 

Interesting how two observers can view the same sequence differently, though, isn't it? I see Pac using a jab to set up a straight left, but Bradley countering with a hook that causes Pacs power punch change slightly in terms of trajectory, and glance off Bradley's shoulder and cheek, rather than land flush against his face.

You see Bradley's hook as somewhat inconsequential, and Pac's left as being the best shot in the exchange. Since neither fighter appears particularly affected by the end of that sequence, it's a judgement call to determine who got the better of it. And if a whole round happens to be comprised of sequences like the one that was displayed, then scoring it isn't necessarily an easy task.

Pac won most of his rounds clearly, and in my opinion he did win the majority of rounds in this fight. But there were a number of rounds that were up for grabs, and while I personally think it would be a stretch to give all of them to Bradley, it's not like Pac dominated these particular rounds in such a way where a judge had to score them for him.

 

Nah....it was a good hook TIM landed.....but everyone is pressed about TIM working the jab in the fight even though it did little to no damage.....Pac lands a jab and straight left to Bradley's hook and even though Tims on shot was better than the jab and straight Pac landed its still 2 to 1.

The actual flush shots that TIM landed in the 12 rounds can be counted on one hand....the entire fight consisted of a lot of one sided action where Pac dominated and controlled the action which is why there's so much attention to the robbery.

Timmy is a good guy but there was a huge gap in class between him and Pac.

 

Punch stats are wrong but it's a quality vs quantity round. Bradley was getting his head knocked back a lot in in the second of that half of that round. I'd score it for Pac but it was a much closer round than my initial look.

 

But this is assuming thats actually what happend and in this fight I do not see it again I challenge anybody to drag out the 7th round and show me where Pacquiao landed 27 shots.

if you can show me that Manny landed 27 shots in round 7 to bradleys 9 I will stop right now.

So go grab that round, use a video editor and put that round in Slo Motion and highlight each and every landed shot by Pac that adds up to 27 for the round.

you wont be able to but thats what Compu Box reported and here is whats funny, Bradley won that round on all three cards, a 27 to 9 edge if it were true should mean that Pac won that round

But he didnt win that round why? because Compu Box works for HBO thats part of the smoke and mirrors

 

I pretty much agree with Max. Although round 7 & 8 were closer than makes them out to be, particularly round 8 from what I remember. Basically been saying the same thing. Manny won his rounds more clearly, more often. The tale of the fight is Pac won 6 rounds and then there were 6 somewhat close rounds.

I think the key is more tied rounds need to be scored. In the old days, this would have been a 7-3-2 type scorecard.