Judge Steven Blea issues apology for terrible score (click to see new bad score)

So he offers an apology then states he wasn't wrong about what he's apologized for? He ought to run for political office with that spin job

 

Sounds like complete bs

 

Manufactured nonsense to try and shift focus from that blatant bribery.

 

He's saying his score 117-110 is ridiculous but he still thinks Valdez won, just not as much as his scorecard said

 

How anyone can think Valdez won is beyond me

 

He scored 3 of the first 4 rounds for Valdez.

 

Thats amazing

He got schooled in the early rounds

 

Well Valdez did win. Being outraged at the wideness of his score is one thing, being outraged that Valdez won is another.

This sort of thing has happened before. Fans get outraged over an outlier scorecard that had it too wide for their liking, then that morphs into outrage about who won. *cough* Canelo GGG 1.

Of course the same people who fawned outrage over Canelo GGG 1 made the same argument then that this judge is now apoligizing for, that the champ should get the benefit of the doubt in close rounds because he's the champ and the challenger needs to take it to the champ to beat the champ. Remember that whole thing. Now that whole argument has been turned on its head.

 

You wouldn't know what a schooling was if it smacked you in the mouth lmao.

 

He’s not embarrassed by the scorecard. He’s embarrassed that he’s being publicly shamed for taking a bribe.

 

Please, you wouldn't know a decent score card if it took the form of an atom and landed on that big head you own

 

My above point proven

 

But but but . . . Champion's Advantage. "The challenger has to take the fight ot the Champ to beat the Champ" -GGG fans after Canelo 1

 

But but but... Show me a post where i have made that claim?