Judging Reform

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Jul 15, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    The "system" is fine. The corruption is not. Its not as big of a factor with Don King moving into the twilight of his career. Sanctioning bodies that carry fees for their title fights appoint judges?? How fair can that be? A national commission which controls the judges would be better, but whats to stop corruption from entering there as well?
    I think all in all weve seem less controversial decisions with exception of the WBA which to me is very corrupt in the Valueav fights, and conincidentally Valueav is half controlled by King.
     
    lefthook31, Jul 29, 2009
    lefthook31, Jul 29, 2009
    #16
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    How much do you ****in luv it?!

    Well i still agree!
     
    teeto, Jul 29, 2009
    teeto, Jul 29, 2009
    #17
  3. Pat_Lowe

    Pat_Lowe Active Member Full Member

    1,194
    15
    Feb 26, 2006
    I think the scoring needs to be modified. A close round should go 10-9 to the winner, a round with a clear winner should be scored 10-8. This rewards fighters who clearly win rounds and would cause less shitty decisions IMO
     
    Pat_Lowe, Jul 29, 2009
    Pat_Lowe, Jul 29, 2009
    #18
Page 2 of 2