Does he squeak in? Maybe the most devastating win anyone ever registered on Terry Norris, and again against the much avoided Graham. Basically did things to both no one would ever duplicate even though both were in with many world class fighters. Two weight world champion as well even though he was just a few pounds shy of being a WW for the first few years of his career. Thoughts?
Doesn't make a top 100 IMO. To be honest, not even close. A win over Norris, a win over Graham, and a 2-weight world champion just isn't enough in my eyes. When I wrote my own top 100, I didn't fit in so many fighters that I feel were better than Julian (Mosley, Marquez, Wright, Camacho etc) so for me it's a no. JMHO
Depends how highly you rate him head to head really.It's not like there is any real defined resume based criteria for what fighters in that range should have accomplished after all. Jackson is a bit underrated usually imo.Even with his workmanlike box-fighting style, he was a notch or two better than guys like Morales or Marquez that usualyl prop up these lists.That crushing power is too much of an equaliser for fighters of that talent level to overcome more often than not.
He was one of those men that was blessed with extraordinary luck against some of his opponents. I'm not a fan at all.
He sure had a lot of it then. :-( McClellan must of had some himself since he was losing the fight on the cards until a bad headbutt froze Jackson in his tracks and turned the tide of the fight.
Nah, not really. They rank in a similar stratosphere for me. Both were flawed, both had very good physical tools to compensate most of the time, but both were capable of being beaten by the very best or simply difficult stylistic matchups. Jackson less so because of his power which gave him a chance against pretty much anyone.
Personally I view Mosley and Winky as clearly superior fighters, but I appreciate your points, all these guys are limited/flawed and Jackson's power was indeed a "great equalizer".