Julian Jackson (when he slipped to 51-4) vs Pazienza (at 40-6) Who would have won?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Nov 6, 2018.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Both fighters were on the way out, but Pazienza was rated higher at super middle at this stage than Jackson was at middle, who would have won at 168lbs or 160 at this time?
     
  2. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,098
    6,902
    Sep 8, 2013
    I will take Jackson over Pazienza anytime.
     
    mark ant likes this.
  3. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,828
    13,118
    Oct 20, 2017
    This wouldn't be around 1996, would it?
     
  4. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    Whatsoever would make you think that?
     
    Jel and mark ant like this.
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,095
    15,563
    Dec 20, 2006
    It is quite possible that this question is pasted from Quora as an alternative to that conspiracy theory.
     
    BlackCloud and mark ant like this.
  6. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    You got me!
     
    Jel likes this.
  7. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,461
    35,968
    Jan 8, 2017
    Jackson wins ,he'd bust up paz badly .
     
  8. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,827
    6,589
    Dec 10, 2014
    Who cares

    prime for prime Jackson way better than Paz.
     
    mark ant and PhillyPhan69 like this.