Julio Caesar Chavez, has his "star" faded?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Longhhorn71, Feb 13, 2012.


  1. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    When he was on a tear...many had him rated right up close
    to Duran.

    Now, you don't hear much about him.

    Obviously, he was never welterweight...and maybe Jr. Welter
    was too high for him also.

    Should he have just stayed down at Lightweight and totally dominated?
     
  2. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Only if Pernell Whitaker hadn't been born.

    Then again, if Whitaker had never been born perhaps even welterweight wouldn't have been a problem for him. I think Buddy was a winnable fight for Chavez considering styles.

    By the way, some were thinking he could be up there with Ray Robinson or even surpass him when he was on a tear.
     
  3. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    Definitely, he was massive at one point. though i felt he was overestimated by quite some distance for the latter half of his active career.Too many people seemed to still see him as the Chavez of the Rosario and earlier fights, even as he was obviously getting slower and more workmanlike\less dynamic at 140 as the 90s era kicked in.


    I'd rather have him stay at lightweight, carve out a title run there and fight Whitaker earlier.Maybe a series with both nearer peak.

    This said, with the dust long settled on his career, he seems to be rated quite smartly by most posters around here.Definitely not dismissed or obviously underestimated too often.
     
  4. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    most successful world title defenses in history, more than twice as much as duran.
    undefeated in his first 90 fights, definately GOAT
     
  5. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Not as good as Duran, that much can be seen on film. At 130 and even more so at 135, he was one of the best fighters ever though.
     
  6. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Would Lightweight Floyd have toyed with him?
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,155
    Feb 11, 2005
    I rank him very highly.

    By the time he made the consciousness of the larger American audience, he had already peaked and was sort of sustaining before his long slide down.
     
  8. Moochie

    Moochie Member Full Member

    248
    2
    Feb 12, 2012
    Lightweight Floyd struggled mightily with his sparring partner. That oughta answa dat!
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I doubt it personally, I rate Floyd very highly. But educated pressure is not the same as regular aggression, and Chavez is potentially the goat when it comes to educated pressure. Chavez was also very capable with his boxing ability at range, he was comfortable there, had a good defence, a good jab, good movement, though not excessive, and his straight right was his best punch, very accurate from varying ranges.
     
  10. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Only in one of their fights. I had the first a draw. The rematch was clear for Mayweather.
     
  11. Moochie

    Moochie Member Full Member

    248
    2
    Feb 12, 2012
    Didn't look very impressive in the rematch, either. Clear win, but a very timid performance.

    The point stands, there is no earthly way he's "toying" with a prime Chavez.
     
  12. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I never said there was, in fact I said right off the bat that Floyd doesn't toy with him, definitely not imo.

    I was only talking about you saying that he had much trouble with Castillo. He only did in one of their bouts. And I think you're wrong to discredit his performance in the rematch. 'Timid' you may call it, but what it definitely was was Mayweather winning a wide decision over Castillo, who was the top lightweight of that particular era. There is no set way to win a fight, it's subjective, and Floyd did it well in that fight.
     
  13. Moochie

    Moochie Member Full Member

    248
    2
    Feb 12, 2012
    I wasn't responding to you in the first place. You're the one who responded to me.

    I said he struggled mightily with him, and that he did.

    I had it about 8-4, and given the fact that he had two good hands in this one (as it was made such a big deal of in the first fight), I'd have expected more on the offensive end.

    Sure. He won the rematch clean. I don't think his performance in either bodes well in a fight against Castillo's clear superior, and that was the point of my original post.
     
  14. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    I truly believe its a consequence of how he ended his career.

    Roy Jones star is fading for much of the general boxing public, too.

    Memories are important, and the recent ones are stronger than us historically oriented fans like to think they are.

    Ending your career getting the tar kicked out of you by the new heroes of boxing is not going to do you an amazing amount of good if you want to be remembered as a GOAT at all times.

    Its a shame, he was utterly amazing at his peak.
     
  15. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I never disputed anything to do with Chavez! I was calling you out on being subjective as opposed to objective. You said that he struggled mightily with Castillo, so I played Devils advocate by pointing out that that only tells half of the story, because they fought twice and he only struggled with him once.

    That's all I was doing, please don't put some other type of words in my mouth.