julio cesar chavez or miguel cotto who is the all around better fighter?

if they fought each other i'd go with cotto by a beatdown

 

Yeah man me to I mean Julio is like 55 years old somewhat past his prime.

Cotto only has advantages in power and has perhaps a better jab.

 

Chavez is easily the better all round fighter.

 

Lame retort and lame thread.
These days kids think beating a few decent fighters and one great one makes that boxer an atg....History is replete with examples of guys with skills and who beat very good fighters but were not even remotely as good as JCC....
Man after buster douglas beat tyson i bet these kind of posters would compare douglas with 67 ali...:tired

 

Another internet hardman hey!
You claimed cotto was better all round than chavez didnt you? Doesnt that make cotto an atg,coz chavez sure as hell is one...
And jc chavez was considered an atg within his prime at 140,not when he retired...
I laugh when you say why are fighters considered gods in their prime after they have retired,well the current fanboy pbf/cotto trend is to consider fighters gods before they have retired and before they have even achieved anything,i know which method is more logical. Rate boxers on what they achieve,not your man crush/love of them...
And,why should i trust you,from reading your threads and posts you cant even comprehend english pro-bee...:hi:

 

Give me a break unrelentless, Chavez is better at just about everything. Better body puncher, tougher and defo a harder hitter.

 

lol funny thread

 

Delete

 

Delete

 

Delete

 

Chavez easily, unfair comparison imo.

 

Delete

 

I think Cotto is the more versatile.