Julio Cesar Chavez, Roberto Duran & Hector Camacho...Who's the Better Fighter/Resume?

Duran by some way, he certainly has a far superior resume to Camacho anyway. Duran's greatest wins were over DeJesus, Buchanan, Palomino, Leonard, Cuevas, Moore and Barkley. Camacho's greatest wins were over Ramirez, Rosario, Davis Jr, Mancini, Pazienza, Haugen and an ancient Duran. They dont compare well. So Duran should be no.1 for ability and resume. Chavez's greatest wins were against Mayweather, Lockridge, Rosario, Taylor, Camacho, Haugen and Randall. This is still worse than Duran but better than Camacho who he beat head to head. Im certainly not bashing Camacho, he was a better boxer many give him credit for but in no way does he have a better resume than Duran or Chavez.

 

yes i agree we should stone all the people with the same opinion

how dare they

oppz i forgot to use capz to make my dare sound bigger and more scary

perhapz i should be stoned

i

 

:thinkcome on dude, your just the same, when someone talks **** about pacman, you show your ***** traits and start dissing.

 

lol it's got nothing to do with JCC... if we were having a conversation about Yuri Foreman, who I know little about and care even less, I would still take the time to point out this little ******'s badmouthing of fighters and his shittalking in every thread he enters.

 

Duran
Chavez
Camacho

 

Ok first off i actually like camacho but in no way,no how should he be compared DURAN AND CHAVEZ. I thought he had a brief period of greatness, but as camacho has even said"are you trying to say rosario turned me into a *****" interview with ko magazinback in the late 80s.He was just a talented underachiever after that fight,Think about duran was like an old man and he was robbed against a still pretty decent camacho.Another think mr bill is out of his mind camacho was severly beatup by chavez,and chavez would do the same at any weight! I usually favor duran against chavez but you know i agree that chavez might have got him under 140. so Ill go with Duran,chavez (close second) and camacho way way below the guys. Oh yeah iforgot who ever said something about chavez not fighting Bramble,Mancini my god you must be a masochist,Chavez would have hurt mancini serious Mancinis style would have been so easy for chavez,Bramble wasnt much after Rosario knocked him out,Someone one of the posts left out of hisresume ,which was maybe the best performances in his great career against a future HOF,and he was the underdog.

 

Duran, Easily vato.

 

**** off noob :deal

 

Stop crying old man.

Chavez fought a lot of cab drivers just deal with it.

 

camacho's resume was 'frank warren inspired'.

i think it's an insult to compare him to chavez or duran.

 

No chance, Duran gets the most respect by the majority, no question about it.

Anyway, I rank them as such.....

Duran
Chavez
Camacho

This was not hard at all.

 

One could say the same about Duran it was not until his 41st fight that Duran beat a quality name. I totally respect Duran's resume regardless.

 

Thats not right man,he beat Ernesto Marcel in his 17st fight.

He also fought Buckanan and Dejesus before his 41 st fight .

 

Marcel, Kobayashi, Buchanan.

 

Duran, Chavez, Camacho