Jumbo Cummings '81 vrs. Wepner '75

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by clark, Jun 9, 2009.


  1. clark

    clark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,250
    71
    Jun 15, 2005
    Here's a strange one. Does Wepner get cut and stopped?
     
  2. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,632
    345
    Apr 18, 2007
    Good one! Jumbo had tremendous muscular development, including on the back of his neck. He'd need that cushion of protection to absorb the shock of Chuck's repeated rabbit punches. If Wepner got too dirty, Cummings wouldn't resort to the same lame mimickry Ali responded with. No, he'd BITE Chuck like he did Renaldo Snipes.

    Cummings was much stronger physically, had a lower center of gravity, and was a better puncher, in my estimation. By the time the oxygen consumption his huge muscles required had sapped his endurance, I think Wepner would indeed be too bloody to take advantage, and would have spent too much time in retreat to win on points.

    My best guess, since I'm relying on distant memory of Snipes-Cummings and Cummings-Frazier.
     
  3. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,854
    10,064
    Jul 15, 2008
    Wepner a step above and would win by decision or stopage ...
     
  4. HomicideHenry

    HomicideHenry Many Talents, No Successes Full Member

    2,090
    85
    Feb 4, 2009
    Cummings hit as hard as any of the top men in the business, and he was tough. A bout with Wepner, goes the distance. But it would be an ugly fight, imo. I wouldnt be surprised, though, if it was Cummings who came out on top.
     
  5. leverage

    leverage Active Member Full Member

    1,372
    16
    Dec 27, 2006
    I think that wepner wins by late tko. Cummings would get tired and become a victim of being musclebound.
     
  6. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,500
    3,030
    Oct 18, 2004
    Wepner takes it late.Jumbo good, but not that good.
     
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,220
    27,723
    Jan 3, 2007
    If we were to look at these two side by side, then appearance would lead most people to believe that Cummings had the edge. Wepner looked like a pile of wet towels while Cummings was a sculpted muscle man.. Unfortunately, this is not how boxing works, and Chuck is far more proven against world class comp than Cummings is.... As mediocre as Wepner was, he could still pull out a big win every once in a while. Floyd on the otherhand, couldn't beat the crap out of a paper bag.. He failed in every one of his marquee fights, and many of his big named opponents were either past their best, too green, or just not very good to begin with.... Nevertheless, he lost to all of them..

    Wepner by decision.
     
  8. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    I think Cummings would do early on, given that his punching technique (while nothing special) was miles ahead of Wepner's and that he was the more textbook boxer. However, Wepner had stamina (or at least bloody-mindedness to match his bloody-facedness) and would probably hammer home a decision or late stoppage against the woefully undurable Cummings.