And still hw champion of the world........... Wladimir klitschkooooooooooooooooooo :happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy:happy
So CHEF we finally meet... I am Relentless, no.1 Klitschko hater and Haye fan i understand you are Wlad's colon cleanser?
This fight really sort of a no win situation for Wladimir. If he wins, it's what he's supposed to do. He's the bigger man, the natural heavyweight and the favorite going in. Haye is not really seen as a credible threat. More like an exciting long shot. Wladimir winning will not generate many if any props. Wladimir losing will basically destroy any legacy he was building. He already has three losses to less than stellar opponents. Recently he has started to make up for those losses. He's on a roll. He's been unbeatable for the past few years. A loss at this stage though will be really bad for him. Unless, Haye pans out to be a great heavyweight fighter. Which will be difficult given the landscape of mediocre challengers out there.
Sorry but where have the excuses come from in the past??Just a quick question,which fight was Wladimir poisoned and dragged to the ring to fight against his own will?
Just like Brewster and Sanders won - because they were better. Same goes for Lewis v VITLAY too, he was better. Which is why there were absolutely no bull**** excuses after any of those fights from the Klit-ites, obviously.
FW real question here: Do you think that outtoughing a guy makes you better? In Brewster and Purrity's cases Wlad was obviously outclassing from a boxing standpoint, but they outtoughed him in the end and so got the victory. It brings up interesting questions though as to what constitutes "better", I guess it could be a matter of opinion. Before the plaster episode I never considered Margarito "better" as a fighter, but he sure could outtough people. There's not much room for opinion when it comes to Sanders, he was quite obviously better that night.