Just Being Honest, Both Spence & Crawford are overrated.

Walters a better win than Gamboa?
Rigo a better win than Postol?
Linares a better win than Khan?
I think it's debatable, especially if you consider the times the fights took place. I need to rewatch some fights and do some research, but I wouldn't say Loma's best wins are head and shoulders above Crawford's best.

 

The best thing these two having going for them is each other.

Spence will unify against the PBC fighters & Crawford will face the winner.

The guy who cleans up at welter will deserve the hype the American boxing media puts on them.

No-one wants to see them beating up garden gnomes. It's boring & doesn't tell us anything we don't already know.

 

No way in hell Walters is a better win than Gamboa or Rigo a better win than Postol. The Rigo fight means absolutely nothing, Pedraza did way better than Rigo and gave Loma issues, are we going to pretend that Pedraza is better than Rigo? No, there's weight classes for a reason. Linares win is better than Khan, just because Loma moved up and Khan looked like **** in his previous fight. Linares looked **** in his last couple fights too but he was still more durable. Skill wise Khan is better than Linares, but durability is just not there anymore.

 

Spence is over rated indeed because he got on P4P list for no reason at all and is now at #5. He never unified or did anything of note.
Crawford is a 3 division champion and became undisputed unified champ at 140.
If you ask me their achievements are world apart.

 

There isn’t a fighter out there who isn’t overrated, apart from maybe usyk, inoue, Joshua these are the only fighters actively trying to fight the best available.
It’s easy to overrate/elevate fighters at the moment as boxing is riding on a wave, bringing casuals with it, these are easy convinced with a few YouTube videos and abit of hype, I hear people every other week are you watching the fight tonight? People that have no interest in boxing that just need something to talk about, but generally we are all to blame as the match ups we are seeing now are getting worse and yet we still watch. The decline in quality started with the mcgregor mayweather farce, now multi fight contracts worth 7 figures or more are getting dished out without specified the quality of opponents.
So overrated yes as they haven’t proven themselves against the best, yet people calling them p4p

 

Wtf is a gither? Are you ****ing ******ed lmao, it's not hard to understand that Rigo moved up 2 weight classes and had no chance, while Postol was coming off a career defining win in HIS division. Do you think Pedraza is better than Rigo? He did better than Loma. Is it that hard for you to understand that he was too small to be at 130?

Movement, combinations, jab. I mean really I can't give Linares that much credit, who has he beat? Who has Linares beat that Khan would lose to during Collazo/Alexander time. Right now he's obviously not the same. Khan is sloppy and losses concentration but if he had durability he'd be a far harder fight than Linares.

 

You forget Loma has Russel jr. on his resume and it’s one of the best wins loma has , maybe the best.

 

Rigo is better than Postal , but Postal is a better win because he was in his prime and Crawford moved up to his division to beat him.

Postal is a better win for the same reason Loma's win over Linares is better than Cano's.

Not giving Bud any credit for his wins while hoisting up Rigo as a great win just reveals a biased agenda.

 

Hot take: Crawford's win over Horn is better than Spence's over Mikey.
Crawford took on a champ in his 1st fight at welter and stopped him. Same Horn who was coming off Pac win.

 

Eye balls say Loma is a special fighter.
Crawford is an excellent fighter, very
skilled.
Spence is a very good champion at welterweight.
All are current best.