I agree that should be the case, but there's always the occasional idiot. Like the one that suggested Floyd would KO Leonard in 5 atsch
When did he run? The Hagler fight is the only one I can think of when he relied purely on boxing/moving. Then again, that is the only chance he had of winning, so that is called good strategy. Why do you ****ing ******s always bring up the Norris fight when he was way past his prime?
rodney is an idiot Good poster ????? If you thinkd so ??????? I dont. The Terry Norris thing was just disrespectful by the way...
This is the stuff that comes out of your mind. You ignorant ****. Or maybe you just cant help it with your limited cranial capacity. Which you probably inherited from your mother. Cant stick to boxing -- can you. The brain wont let you -- eh .
Why do you constantly bash Leonard despite the fcat that you have not put across one argument which has swayed anybody?
Cite a source, if you're going to make that argument. And, bear in mind that SRL was out of the picture in 1982, while Pryor had only really started to come into his own in late 1980. Are you saying then that leonard ducked Pryor in order to face Duran, Kalule, and Hearns?
I was never a big fan of SRL but to be completely honest the man was a serious bad ass. To beat a prime Hearns and to be very competitive with a bigger, stronger Hagler (although I thought Hagler won), not too mention wins over Duran, Ayub Kalule, and Wilfred Benitez... bad ass.